1 |
Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Revised_Supplemental_Materials_for_reviewers – Supplemental material for Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Supplemental_material – Supplemental material for Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Revised_Supplemental_Materials_for_reviewers – Supplemental material for Cue coalitions and additivity in predictive processing: The interaction between case and prosody in L2 German ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Supplemental_material – Supplemental material for Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Speaker-specific processing of anomalous utterances ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Existing work shows that readers often interpret grammatical errors (e.g., The key to the cabinets *were shiny) and sentence-level blends (“without-blend”: Claudia left without her headphones *off ) in a non-literal fashion, inferring that a more frequent or more canonical utterance was intended instead. This work examines how interlocutor identity affects the processing and interpretation of anomalous sentences. We presented anomalies in the context of “emails” attributed to various writers in a self-paced reading paradigm and used comprehension questions to probe how sentence interpretation changed based upon properties of the item and properties of the “speaker.” Experiment 1 compared standardised American English speakers to L2 English speakers; Experiment 2 compared the same standardised English speakers to speakers of a non-Standardised American English dialect. Agreement errors and without-blends both led to more non-literal responses than comparable canonical items. For agreement errors, more ...
|
|
Keyword:
170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified; FOS Psychology
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.25384/sage.c.4053692 https://figshare.com/collections/Speaker-specific_processing_of_anomalous_utterances/4053692
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
11 |
The interaction of notional number and morphophonology in subject–verb agreement: A role for working memory ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The interaction of notional number and morphophonology in subject–verb agreement: A role for working memory ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface: A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Oct2017_Materials – Supplemental material for Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface: A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Oct2017_Materials – Supplemental material for Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface: A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Frequency at the syntax–discourse interface: A bidirectional study on fronting options in L1/L2 German and L1/L2 English ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Lexical constraints in second language learning: Evidence on grammatical gender in German*
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|