| 1 |
Linguistic Landscape as an arena of conflict – language removal, exclusion, and ethnic identity construction in Lithuania (Vilnius)
|
|
|
|
In: The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Conflict and categorisation: a corpus and discourse study of naming participants in forced migration
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years:A study of parliamentary language using corpus linguistic methods and automated semantic tagging
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
“When did you decide to tell the truth?” Negotiating truth in rape trials before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Critical Stylistics
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This chapter is an overview of an approach that I have been calling ‘ critical stylistics ’ in order to distinguish it from mainstream critical discourse analysis (CDA) on the one hand and from literary stylistics on the other. In order to show how it works, I will need to introduce a broader framework to demonstrate how it fits into a general theory of language. The fi rst thing to say is that stylistics puts text (understood broadly to include all language use) at the centre of its activity (Jeff ries and McIntyre 2010). This is true of critical stylistics too (Jeff ries 2010a, 2014). I do not wish to criticise those linguists who put context at the heart of what they do (though that makes it less clearly linguistic in nature). Nor would I want to dismiss the work of linguists who work mainly on de-contextual and de-textual understandings of how language (phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics) works. It will be seen below that these systematic aspects of language are vital to understanding how we interpret text, and this work is therefore one of the underpinnings needed to progress with stylistics, critical or otherwise. It is also, of course, important to understand how various aspects of context can and do aff ect the reception of texts. All I would add here is that, in my opinion, more progress is made by investigating natural phenomena (such as human language) systematically by focusing on specifi c parts of the object of scrutiny than by trying to explain everything at once.
|
|
Keyword:
P Philology. Linguistics
|
|
URL: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/30209/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
The rise of choice as an absolute ‘good’: A study of British manifestos, (1900-2010)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Textual meaning and its place in a theory of language
|
|
|
|
In: Topics in Linguistics, Vol 15, Iss 1 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Key words in the press: A critical corpus-driven analysis of ideology in the Blair years (1998- 2007)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
‘Radicalisation’ and ‘democracy’ - a linguistic analysis of rhetorical change
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
A teaching career in three chapters: why I teach stylistics, how I teach it and why I enjoy it
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
