22 |
Evaluation of Sentence Representations in Semantic Text Similarity Tasks ; Utvärdering av meningsrepresentation för semantisk textlikhet
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
The unexplored role of handshape similarity in processing numbers on the hands ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
“Alignment is All You Need”: Analyzing Cross-Lingual Document Similarity for Domain-Specific Applications ...
|
|
Dutta, Sourav. - : Leibniz Universität Hannover (LUH),L3S Research Center,CLEOPATRA ITN, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
Korpuslinguistik in der Rechtswissenschaft. Eine webbasierte Analyseplattform für EuGH-Entscheidungen ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Idioms Comprehension in View of Degrees of Transparency and Contributing Factors: A Contrastive Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
27 |
Idioms Comprehension in View of Degrees of Transparency and Contributing Factors: A Contrastive Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Text analysis using colexification networks ... : Textanalyse mit colexification Netzwerken ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
31 |
Designing Secure and Usable Wake Words; Reclaiming the Road: How Agendas for American Car-free Cities are Advancing in the COVID Era ...
|
|
: University of Virginia, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Effects of similarity on speakers’ production of referring expressions ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
A cross-linguistic investigation of retroactive similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
34 |
I Explain, You Collaborate, He Cheats: An Empirical Study with Social Network Analysis of Study Groups in a Computer Programming Subject
|
|
|
|
In: Applied Sciences ; Volume 11 ; Issue 19 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
35 |
Toward a Better Understanding of Academic Programs Educational Objectives: A Data Analytics-Based Approach
|
|
|
|
In: Applied Sciences ; Volume 11 ; Issue 20 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
A Unifying Framework for Analysis of Spatial-Temporal Event Sequence Similarity and Its Applications
|
|
|
|
In: ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information ; Volume 10 ; Issue 9 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
37 |
Bidirectional String Anchors: A New String Sampling Mechanism ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
38 |
СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ЛЮБОВНОЙ ЛИРИКИ А.А. ФЕТА И СЮЙ ЧЖИМО ... : COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LOVE LYRICS OF A.A. FET AND XU ZHIMO ...
|
|
Дай Мэнцзе. - : Мир науки, культуры, образования, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
39 |
The Influence of Cross-Linguistic Similarity and Language Background on Writing to Dictation
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The current research was completed and thanks to financial aid provided by the doctoral research grant FPU16/01748 to AI and grants from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades-Fondos Feder to TB (PGC2018-093786-B-I00) and DP (PCIN-2015-165-C02-01 and PSI2017-89324-C2-1-P) and from the Feder Andalucia to TB (A-CTS-111-UGR18 and P20.00107). ; This study used a word dictation task to examine the influence of a variety of factors on word writing production: cognate status (cognate vs. non-cognate words), orthographic (OS) and phonological similarity (PS) within the set of cognate words, and language learning background [late bilinguals (LBs) with academic literacy and formal instruction in English and Spanish, and heritage speakers (HSs) with academic literacy and formal instruction only in English]. Both accuracy and reaction times for the first key pressed by participants (indicating lexical access), and the time required to type the rest of the word after the first keypress (indicating sublexical processing) was assessed. The results revealed an effect of PS on the dictation task particularly for the first keypress. That is, cognates with high PS were processed faster than cognates with low PS. In contrast to reading studies in which PS only revealed a significant effect when the OS between languages was high (O + P+ vs. O + P−), in the dictation to writing task, the phonology had a more general effect across all conditions, regardless of the level of OS. On the other hand, OS tended to be more influential for typing the rest of the word. This pattern is interpreted as indicating the importance of phonology (and PS in cognates) for initial lexical retrieval when the input is aural. In addition, the role of OS and PS during co-activation was different between groups probably due to the participants’ linguistic learning environment. Concretely, HSs were found to show relatively lower OS effects, which is attributed to the greater emphasis on spoken language in their Spanish language learning experiences, compared to the formal education received by the LBs. Thus, the study demonstrates that PS can influence lexical processing of cognates, as long as the task demands specifically require phonological processing, and that variations in language learning experiences also modulate lexical processing in bilinguals. ; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades-Fondos Feder FPU16/01748 ; Feder Andalucia PGC2018-093786-B-I00 PCIN-2015-165-C02-01 PSI2017-89324-C2-1-P ; A-CTS-111-UGR18 P20.00107
|
|
Keyword:
Bilingual writing; Heritage speakers; Language co-activation; Orthographic/phonological similarity; Writing to dictation
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679956 http://hdl.handle.net/10481/71239
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
40 |
Avoiding conflict : when speaker coordination does not require conceptual agreement
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 2624-8212 ; Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3, No 523920 (2021) P. 24 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|