DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 62

1
Intonational meaning in Spanish: Production Experiment ...
Fliessbach, Jan. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
The Brain Dynamics of Syllable Duration and Semantic Predictability in Spanish
In: Brain Sciences; Volume 12; Issue 4; Pages: 458 (2022)
BASE
Show details
3
Intonational meaning in Spanish: PRESEEA Madrid corpus examples ...
Fliessbach, Jan. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
4
Materials for Brown & Chang (2022) ...
Chang, Charles. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
Dataset for Brown & Chang (2022) ...
Chang, Charles. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
6
Regressive cross-linguistic influence in multilingual speech rhythm ...
Chang, Charles. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
7
The that-trace effect in Spanish–English Code-Switching ...
Hoot, Bradley. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
8
VISUAL AND AUDITORY CUES OF ASSERTIONS AND QUESTIONS IN BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE AND MEXICAN SPANISH: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
In: ISSN: 2236-9740 ; Journal of Speech Sciences ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03012006 ; Journal of Speech Sciences, Journal of Speech Sciences, 2020, pp.73 - 92. ⟨10.20396/joss.v9i00.14958⟩ ; http://revistas.iel.unicamp.br/ojs_joss/index.php/journalofspeechsciences/article/view/185 (2020)
BASE
Show details
9
Comparison of Fundamental Frequency Between Spanish and English in Heritage Speakers of Spanish
Sergent, Ryane. - : The Ohio State University, 2020
BASE
Show details
10
The Production and Perception of Subject Focus Prosody in L2 Spanish
In: Doctoral Dissertations (2020)
BASE
Show details
11
Heritage speakers' use of prosodic strategies in focus marking in Spanish
In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, vol 23, iss 5 (2019)
BASE
Show details
12
Straight to the Subject. A Unified Analysis of Preverbal and Postverbal Subjects in Broad Focus Constructions in Spanish
BASE
Show details
13
Vowel length in Intemelian Ligurian: an experimental and cross-dialectal investigation
In: Garassino, Davide; Dipino, Dalila (2019). Vowel length in Intemelian Ligurian: an experimental and cross-dialectal investigation. In: 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia, 5 August 2019 - 9 August 2019, 122-126. (2019)
BASE
Show details
14
Fonética y fonología de los movimientos melódicos en el habla rural de Cuba y Venezuela
Díaz, C. (Chaxiraxi); Dorta, J. (Josefa). - : Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 2019
BASE
Show details
15
Acquisition of Spanish Intonation by Native Korean Speakers
Son, JyEun. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2018
In: Son, JyEun. (2018). Acquisition of Spanish Intonation by Native Korean Speakers. UCLA: Hispanic Languages and Literatures 0426. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8rs5k4nj (2018)
Abstract: Acquiring native-like proficiency in a second language (L2) is difficult to achieve after the critical period (Lenneberg 1967). Acquisition of L2 intonation and prosody has been assumed to be the last stage of L2 acquisition and is one of the least explored areas of intonation research. Languages differ in their prosody, especially in the way they mark prominence. Languages like English and Spanish mark word prominence by pitch accent realized on the stressed syllable of a word (most often a content word). Languages like Korean, which does not have lexical or postlexical stress, mark word prominence by forming the word into one prosodic unit called the Accentual Phrase (AP) or by locating the word at the beginning of an AP (Jun 1993). In Jun’s prosodic typology (Jun 2005b, 2014b), the former type belongs to a head-prominence language, and the latter type belongs to an edge-prominence language. In addition to this prosodic difference, Spanish and Korean differ in the division of lexicon. Spanish distinguishes between a content word and a function word, but Korean does not have function words. Instead, all words in Korean are content words, consisting of a lexical item plus a case marker or postpositions, which do not form a separate AP, but always form an AP together with the preceding lexical item. Given these prosodic and morphological difference between the two languages, the present study is divided into four fundamental components. First, I posit that Korean Accentual Phrase (AP) initial tone-segment mapping will be applied to Spanish, in that the High tone will be applied when the phrase-initial segment is aspirated (/ph, th, kh, tʃh/), tense (/p*, t*, k*, s*, tʃ*/) or /h/ or /s/; otherwise, Low tone will be applied (Jun 1993, 1998, 2000, 2005). Secondly, I hypothesize that nuclear and pre-nuclear Pitch Accents in Spanish will be realized differently since Korean does not have this distinction. Thirdly, I posit that Korean learners will tend to produce an AP-like tonal unit over a function word as well as a content word. Lastly, I hypothesize that the boundary tones in Spanish in information-seeking yes-no questions and wh-questions, invitation yes-no questions and wh-questions will be realized as HH% or LH% due to L1 influence.Twenty-one L2 participants representing three proficiency levels (seven beginners, seven intermediates, and seven advanced learners) recorded themselves reading words, phrases, and sentences in Spanish in as naturally as possible. Native Mexican and Peninsular Spanish speakers (three participants each) also participated as a control group. Praat was used to analyze the intonation, and the pitch contour was labeled following the Spanish ToBI (Tones and Break Indices) (Beckman et al. 2002, Prieto & Roseano 2010) and Korean ToBI (Jun 2000, 2005) transcription conventions, which are based on the Autosegmental-Metrical model of intonational phonology (Pierrehumbert 1980, Beckman & Pierrehumbert 1986, Ladd 1996/2008) of each language. The results showed that the Korean Accentual Phrase (AP) initial tone-segment mapping had a stronger effect on beginner and intermediate groups than advanced learners. Also, L1 Korean speakers had difficulties in marking prominence according to Spanish conventions and had a strong tendency to produce an “L H” (rising) tonal pattern over a word, i.e., the AP tone pattern, regardless of the location of stress. Stress-based pitch accent in Spanish is difficult to acquire for speakers of L1 Korean, which has no word-prosody. Korean AP tones, which cue word prominence via edge marking, are negatively transferred in producing a word and pitch accent in Spanish. Also, in Seoul Korean, as each word forms one Accentual Phrase (AP), L2 learners produced AP-like tonal units especially on monosyllabic function words in Spanish. It is interesting that the majority of the intermediate and advanced Native Korean Speakers (NKS) produced L% in information-seeking wh-questions and in invitation wh-questions, which is not what I had predicted based on previous research. This may be due to the English intonation of information-seeking wh-questions and invitation wh-questions, which use a falling tone. Future studies are needed to confirm these initial findings of the influence of English on L1 Koreans’ production. Additionally, according to the results, beginners tend to commit more errors, and I posit that this is because these types of sentences require conveying of meaning through intonation, beyond simple lexical items. According to these results, the four dimensions of Mennen (2015)’s L2 Intonation Learning theory (LILt)) were supported. So far, no study has been carried out regarding the Acquisition of Spanish intonation by Native Korean Speakers based on the Autosegmental-Metrical model of intonational phonology, using Spanish ToBI and Korean ToBI transcription conventions. This study offers significant contributions to the field of L2 prosody acquisition of native Korean speakers learning Spanish, as my analysis is not limited to boundary tone realization, but extended to the inventory of structural phonological elements such as Pitch Accents in Spanish and Accentual Phrases in Korean. In general, L2 learners are not aware of the prosodic characteristics of their second language and tend to apply their native language’s prosodic features to their L2.
Keyword: Acquisition of intonation; Foreign language education; Intonation; Intonational Phonology; Korean intonation; Language; Linguistics; Prosody; Spanish intonation
URL: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8rs5k4nj
BASE
Hide details
16
The interplay of information structure, semantics, prosody, and word ordering in Spanish intransitives
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 9, No 1 (2018); 8 ; 1868-6354 (2018)
BASE
Show details
17
Refugees in the Spanish press: A corpus-assisted study of the semantic prosody of the term refugiado from a diachronic perspective
Soto Almela, Jorge; Alcaraz-Mármol, Gema. - : Edicions i Publicacions de la Universitat de Lleida, 2018
BASE
Show details
18
The Realization of Focus in Asturian Spanish
In: Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, Vol 17, Iss 1 (2018) (2018)
BASE
Show details
19
The Realization of Focus in Asturian Spanish
In: Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, Vol 17, Iss 1 (2018) (2018)
BASE
Show details
20
Pitch range and identification of emotions in Spanish speech: A perceptual study ; Rango tonal e identificación de emociones en el habla en español: un estudio perceptivo
In: Estudios de fonética experimental; 2018: Vol.: 27; p. 13-36 ; 1575-5533 (2018)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
59
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern