| 1 |
Watch this Space
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 15, Iss 2 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Watch this Space
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 66-67 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The Fossilization-Formula Interface
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 62-64 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-3 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Focus on Multilingualism: More Dots to Connect
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 39-41 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
L2 Learner-Made Formulaic Expressions and Constructions
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 1-18 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Focus on Multilingualism: More Dots to Connect
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 13, Iss 2 (2013) (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
L2 Learner-Made Formulaic Expressions and Constructions
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2010) (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2009) (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
The Fossilization-Formula Interface
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 2 (2009) (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The Basis of Empirical Knowledge
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2007) (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The ACTFL Guidelines: A Realistic View of Language that is Problematic for Assessment
|
|
|
|
In: Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, Vol 7, Iss 2 (2007) (2007)
|
|
Abstract:
Ellis and Larsen-Freeman (2006) state that indices of language fluency and proficiency would be extremely valuable for researchers. Guidelines that provide benchmarks for development are useful for both inter-learner and intra-learner comparability. The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines may be useful for their descriptive power and arguably realistic assumptions of language development. However, the nature of the guidelines’ construct paradoxically limits its usefulness. The following commentary will describe my perspective of the ACTFL’s view of language development and explain why the putative truths about language development and language use limit the utility of the scales.
|
|
Keyword:
English language; LB5-3640; PE1-3729; Theory and practice of education
|
|
URL: https://doaj.org/article/ec5c2181d22e46edb898b7dbf8e41c51
https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v7i2.1512
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 13 |
The Forum The ACTFL Guidelines:
|
|
|
|
In: http://journals.tc-library.org/templates/about/editable/pdf/Hall_Forum1.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
