DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hits 101 – 111 of 111

101
The Effect of Peer-Editing on the Quality of 11th Grade Composition
In: UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations (1984)
BASE
Show details
102
Self-concept of parental evaluation of peer relationships in cleft lip and palate children
Jones, James E.. - 1983
BASE
Show details
103
Social structure and peer terminology in a black adolescent gang
In: Language in society. - London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press 11 (1982) 3, 391-411
BLLDB
Show details
104
Procedural variations in group contingencies : effects on children's academic and social behaviors
In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley 15 (1982) 4, 533-544
BLLDB
Show details
105
Social interaction in children's same-age and mixed-age discussion groups
In: Proceedings of the conference child language development. - Launceston, Tasmania : Launceston Teachers Centre (1980), 47-57
BLLDB
Show details
106
Transkriptband Jugendsprache : gesprochene Sprache in der Peer-Group
Fladrich, Marcel (VerfasserIn); Bahlo, Nils Uwe (VerfasserIn). - Berlin : Retorika
DNB Subject Category Language
IDS Mannheim
Show details
107
SUBVERTING AND REPRODUCING INSTITUTIONALIZED NORMS FOR LANGUAGE USE IN MULTILINGUAL PEER GROUPS
In: http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/download/2839/2820/
BASE
Show details
108
Peer and Self Assessment in Massive Online Classes
In: http://hci.stanford.edu/publications/2013/Kulkarni-peerassessment.pdf
BASE
Show details
109
The Reliability of Students ’ Self and Peer Assessment for Group Works in Taiwan’s ELT Courses at the Tertiary Level
In: http://ir.lib.au.edu.tw/dspace/bitstream/987654321/2612/1/CH10-conf.2009_ke01_01.pdf
BASE
Show details
110
Iterative learning: Self and peer assessment of group work
In: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p198.pdf
Abstract: Group work is commonly used to help students learn and develop team skills. However, many students report having poor experiences of assessable group work. While self and peer assessment can be used to reward student contributions more equitably in assessment contexts, careful design and support issues need addressing to ensure its success. This paper reports a social constructivist approach to assessing and improving group work. First, the literature linking summative and formative assessment with group work is reviewed. The importance of formative assessment in developing shared understandings between academics and students of the assessment criteria, in particular through self and peer ratings on criteria related to their group work contributions, is discussed. Second, findings from a pilot study, employing an online tool (SPARK) to enable collection and aggregation of self and peer ratings, are presented. Two cycles of data analysis, interpretation and reflections generate what we term iterative learning. Third, when carefully integrated, SPARK facilitates not only individual and groups of students to learn but also affords opportunities for academics to learn and refine assessment that increases student engagement. This paper will be useful for academics and academic developers seeking to support improved group work learning and assessment activities.
Keyword: formative assessment; group work; self and peer assessment; SPARK; team work
URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p198.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.513.7433
BASE
Hide details
111
Chinese graduate students ’ perceptions of group size, efficiency and conflict in peer response 77 Chinese graduate students ’ perceptions of group size, efficiency and conflict in peer
In: http://nus.edu/celc/publications/RELT72/077to102lee.pdf
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Catalogues
11
5
13
0
2
0
0
Bibliographies
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
64
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern