DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 13 of 13

1
Counting Construcions and Coercion: Container, Portion and Measure Interpretations
In: Oslo Studies in Language, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2018) (2018)
BASE
Show details
2
Satz: J.-M. List, LATEX
In: https://zenodo.org/record/11879/files/list-2014-thesis-with-cover.pdf (2014)
BASE
Show details
3
Events: Modification, Aspect and Lexical Meaning Course Number: LSA.315
In: http://web.stanford.edu/~cleoc/lsainst-syll.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
4
Nominal and verbal semantic structure: Analogies and interactions
In: http://plaza.ufl.edu/hfilip/hongkong.pdf (2001)
BASE
Show details
5
Reduced Relatives: Lexical Constraint-Based Analysis
In: http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~filip/papers/reduced.ps (1998)
BASE
Show details
6
Quantification, Aspect And Lexicon
In: http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~filip/papers/quantification.ps (1996)
BASE
Show details
7
Integrating Telicity, Aspect and NP Semantics: The Role of Thematic Structure
In: http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~filip/papers/integrating.ps (1996)
BASE
Show details
8
The Telicity Parameter Revisited
In: http://plaza.ufl.edu/hfilip/filip.salt14.pdf
BASE
Show details
9
Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11(1): 55–101, 2003. Prefixes and the Delimitation of Events*
In: http://plaza.ufl.edu/hfilip/Filip_JSL11.1.pdf
BASE
Show details
10
The telicity parameter revisited
In: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mE1N2VhY/filip.salt14.pdf
BASE
Show details
11
Filip, H. and G. Carlson, Reciprocity, Distributivity and Collectivity 1 Linguistics and Philosophy24:417-466, 2001. DISTRIBUTIVITY STRENGTHENS RECIPROCITY, COLLECTIVITY WEAKENS IT
In: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/TRhMzViM/filip.reciprocity.pdf
Abstract: In this paper we examine interactions of the reciprocal with distributive and collective operators, which are encoded by prefixes on verbs expressing the reciprocal relation: namely, the Czech distributive po- and the collectivizing na-. The theoretical import of this study is two-fold. First, it contributes to our knowledge of how word-internal operators interact with phrasal syntax/semantics. Second, the prefixes po- and na-generate (a range of) readings of reciprocal sentences for which the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis (SMH) proposed by Dalrymple et al. (1998) does not make the right predictions. The distributive prefix po- prefers the Strong Reciprocity reading, although the SMH predicts that a weakening should take place, while with the prefix na- we find cases where weaker reciprocal readings are preferable to the stronger ones predicted by the SMH. This behavior of po- and na- is, we propose, due to the way in which they modulate two factors that are crucial in the interpretation of reciprocal sentences: (i) the relevant subpluralities in the group denoted by the reciprocal’s antecedent, and (ii) the strength of reciprocal relations. We provide a detailed analysis of the semantics of the prefixes po- and na- and their contribution to the meaning of reciprocal sentences within the general framework of event semantics with lattice structures.
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.502.4456
http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/TRhMzViM/filip.reciprocity.pdf
BASE
Hide details
12
Journal of Memory and Language 47, 30–49 (2002) doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2832 Circumscribing Referential Domains during Real-Time Language Comprehension
In: http://www.ling.rochester.edu/people/carlson/download/exp_psycholing/domains.JML.pdf
BASE
Show details
13
SALT XI, 2001 The Semantics of Case in Russian Secondary Predication
In: http://semarch.linguistics.fas.nyu.edu/Archive/2UwZDJlZ/filip.semantics.of.case.pdf
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
13
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern