1 |
Investigating the nature of infants' lexical speed of processing
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Do the Eyes Have It? A Systematic Review on the Role of Eye Gaze in Infant Language Development
|
|
|
|
In: Front Psychol (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Contributions of Abstract Extratextual Talk and Interactive Style to Preschoolers’ Vocabulary Development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Improving the robustness of infant lexical processing speed measures
|
|
|
|
In: Behav Res Methods (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The Impact of Interactive Shared Book Reading on Children's Language Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Story choice matters for caregiver extra-textual talk during shared reading with preschoolers.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Developmental psycholinguistics teaches us that we need multi-method, not single-method, approaches to the study of linguistic representation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Combining Language Corpora With Experimental and Computational Approaches for Language Acquisition Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Diversity not quantity in caregiver speech: Using computational modeling to isolate the effects of the quantity and the diversity of the input on vocabulary growth
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Children who hear large amounts of diverse speech learn language more quickly than children who do not. However, high correlations between the amount and the diversity of the input in speech samples makes it difficult to isolate the influence of each. We overcame this problem by controlling the input to a computational model so that amount of exposure to linguistic input (quantity) and the quality of that input (lexical diversity) were independently manipulated. Sublexical, lexical, and multi-word knowledge were charted across development (Study 1), showing that while input quantity may be important early in learning, lexical diversity is ultimately more crucial, a prediction confirmed against children’s data (Study 2). The model trained on a lexically diverse input also performed better on nonword repetition and sentence recall tests (Study 3) and was quicker to learn new words over time (Study 4). A language input that is rich in lexical diversity outperforms equivalent richness in quantity for learned sublexical and lexical knowledge, for well-established language tests, and for acquiring words that have never been encountered before.
|
|
URL: http://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3009286/1/Jones%26Rowland.InPress.CogPsy.pdf http://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3009286/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
Combining Language Corpora With Experimental and Computational Approaches for Language Acquisition Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
How do infants use nonadjacent dependencies during language development?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Child Language (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Child Language (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Is Passive Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From Adult Grammaticality Judgment and Comprehension Studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|