| 2 |
How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Jumping from the highest graded readers to ungraded novels: Four case studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The high-frequency vocabulary of English has traditionally been thought to consist of the 2,000 most frequent word families, and low-frequency vocabulary as that beyond the 10,000 frequency level. This paper argues that these boundaries should be reassessed on pedagogic grounds. Based on a number of perspectives (including frequency and acquisition studies, the amount of vocabulary necessary for English usage, the range of graded readers, and dictionary defining vocabulary), we argue that high-frequency English vocabulary should include the most frequent 3,000 word families. We also propose that the low-frequency vocabulary boundary should be lowered to the 9,000 level, on the basis that 8–9,000 word families are sufficient to provide the lexical resources necessary to be able to read a wide range of authentic texts (Nation 2006). We label the vocabulary between high-frequency (3,000) and low-frequency (9,000+) as mid-frequency vocabulary. We illustrate the necessity of mid-frequency vocabulary for proficient language use, and make some initial suggestions for research addressing the pedagogical challenge raised by mid-frequency vocabulary.
|
|
URL: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/32297/
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9338615&fileId=S0261444812000018
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Jumping from the highest graded readers to ungraded novels: four case studies
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
