21 |
A T1OWA Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Methodology for Searching Feature-based Opinions.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
22 |
Dealing with Incomplete Information in Linguistic Group Decision Making by Means of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
An overview on managing additive consistency of reciprocal preference relations for consistency-driven decision making and Fusion: Taxonomy and future directions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Flexible inverse adaptive fuzzy inference model to identify the evolution of Operational Value at Risk for improving operational risk management
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
A fuzzy credibility model to estimate the operational value at risk using internal and external data of risk events
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering based consensus group decision making model
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
An interaction consensus in group decision making under distributed trust information
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
Successes and challenges in developing a hybrid approach to sentiment analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
30 |
A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
31 |
A consensus approach to the sentiment analysis problem driven by support-based IOWA majority
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Type-1 OWA Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Methodology. Application to Eurobonds Credit Risk Evaluation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
Preference Similarity Network Structural Equivalence Clustering based Consensus Model
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
34 |
Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making model with output variable expressive richness
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link. ; In general, traditional decision-making models are based on methods that perform calculations on quantitative measures. These methods are usually applied to assess possible solutions to a problem, resulting in a ranking of alternatives. However, when it comes to making decisions about qualitative measures –such as service quality–, the quantitative assessment is a bit difficult to interpret. Therefore, taking into account the maturity of the linguistic assessment models, this paper puts forth a new solution proposal. It is a decision-making model that uses linguistic labels –represented with the 2-tuple notation– and a variable expressive richness when providing output results. This solution allows expressing results in a manner closer to the human cognitive system. To achieve this goal, a mechanism has been implemented for measuring the distance among the aggregate ratings, providing the decision-maker with a fast and intuitive answer. The proposal is illustrated with an application example based on the TOPSIS model, using linguistic labels throughout the entire process.
|
|
Keyword:
2-tuple representation; linguistic labels; linguistic TOPSIS model; multi-criteria decision making; variable expressive richness
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2086/14153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.049
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
35 |
Successes and challenges in developing a hybrid approach to sentiment analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
A Consensus Approach to the Sentiment Analysis Problem Driven by Support-Based IOWA Majority
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
38 |
A Hybrid Approach to Sentiment Analysis with Benchmarking Results
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
39 |
A new consensus measure based on Pearson correlation coefficient
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
40 |
A Hybrid Approach to the Sentiment Analysis Problem at the Sentence Level
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|