| 3 |
Structuring participles
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/wccfl/26/paper1653.pdf (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
From hierarchies to features: person splits and direct-inverse alternations
|
|
|
|
In: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2008/10841/pdf/ALEXIADOU_From_hierarchies_to_features_person_splits_and_direct_inverse_alternations.pdf (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect
|
|
|
|
In: http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~pancheva/Iatridou,Anagnostopoulou%26Izvorski(2001).pdf (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Dislocation, resumption and weakest crossover
|
|
|
|
In: Materials on Left-Dislocation ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01054610 ; Elena Anagnostopoulou, Hank van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts. Materials on Left-Dislocation, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, p.193-231, 1997, Linguistics Today 14 (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Toward a Uniform Account of Scrambling and Clitic Doubling
|
|
|
|
In: http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/mitarbeiter/artemis/abrahmax.pdf (1997)
|
|
Abstract:
A commonly held view in the literature on Scrambling and Clitic Doubling is that both constructions are sensitive to Specificity.1 For this reason Sportiche (1992) proposes to unify the two, an approach which has become quite standard in the relevant literature ever since.2 However, the claim that clitic doubling is the counterpart of Germanic scrambling has never been substantiated. In this paper we present extensive evidence from Greek that Clitic Doubling has common formal properties with Germanic Scrambling/Object Shift. Our evidence consists mainly of binding facts observed when doubling takes place, which seem, at first sight, to be completely unexpected. On closer inspection, however, it turns out that these facts are strongly reminiscent of the effects showing up in Germanic scrambling. We propose that these properties can be derived under a theory of clitic constructions along the lines of Sportiche (1992) implemented into the framework of Chomsky (1995). Finally we suggest the that the crosslinguistic distribution of Scrambling as opposed to Clitic Doubling should be linked to a parameter relating to properties of Agr: Move/Merge XP vs. Move/Merge X ° to Agr. We show that this parameter unifies the behaviour of subjects and objects *Parts of the material discussed in this paper have been presented at the 11th Comparative Germanic Syntax
|
|
URL: http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/mitarbeiter/artemis/abrahmax.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.454.1219
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Toward a uniform account of Scrambling and Clitic Doubling
|
|
|
|
In: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2008/10843/pdf/ALEXIADOU_Toward_a_uniform_account_of_Scrambling_and_Clitic_Doubling.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Patterns of Dative-Nominative Alternations*
|
|
|
|
In: http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/files/aasnels41.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Manner vs. Result Complementarity in Verbal Alternations: A View from the Clear-Alternation 1
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/linguistik/sfb732/files/alexiadou-anagnostopoulounels42.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
2003: “Participles and voice
|
|
|
|
In: http://www2.sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de/~monika/publikationen/downloads/buecher/perfektvolume/anagnostopoulou.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Holmberg’s Generalization and Cyclic Linearization Remarks on Fox and Pesetsky
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.mit.edu/linguistics/people/faculty/pesetsky/Anagnostopoulou_Remarks_on_Fox_and_Pesetsky.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
