| 1 |
Dysphagia following non‐traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective pilot study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Current practice and barriers and facilitators to outcome measurement in aphasia rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study using the theoretical domains framework
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
What are the usual assessment practices in adult non-progressive dysarthria rehabilitation? A survey of Australian dysarthria practice patterns
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This aim of this study was to identify assessment practices for non-progressive dysarthria used by Australian speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and to describe these practices within the framework of the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning Disability, and Health (ICF). A 23-item online survey was distributed to Australian SLPs, with 56 responses suitable for data analysis. The majority of SLPs prescribed ‘high importance’ to the assessment of impairment to speech function (96%, n = 54), activity limitations (91%, n = 51) and participation in society (91%, n = 51) in non-progressive dysarthria. However, reported assessment selection for non-progressive dysarthria focused largely on impairment and intelligibility, with assessments addressing participation restrictions being under-utilised. There was also a preference for informal assessment tools across all ICF domains. Over half (69%, n = 37) indicated that current assessment tools for non-progressive dysarthria generally do not meet their needs, with key issues being time-factors and inadequate sensitivity. There was variability in the use of outcome measures for non-progressive dysarthria, with workplace setting, time constraints and a perceived lack of relevance being the most commonly reported barriers to implementation.
|
|
Keyword:
2805 Cognitive Neuroscience; 2912 LPN and LVN; 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; 3310 Linguistics and Language; 3616 Speech and Hearing; Assessment; ICF; Non-progressive dysarthria; Outcome measurement; Speech-language pathology; Survey
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:004b0f1/UQ004b0f1_OA.pdf
https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:004b0f1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Conversations between people with aphasia and speech pathology students via telepractice: a Phase II feasibility study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Telepractice communication partner training for health professionals: A randomised trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Can goal attainment scaling (GAS) accurately identify changes in social communication impairments following TBI?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Exploring the outcomes and perceptions of people with aphasia who conversed with speech pathology students via telepractice: a pilot study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The effects of thrombolysis and endovascular clot retrieval on dysphagia: a scoping review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Aphasia and reperfusion therapies in hyper-acute settings: a scoping review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Conversations between people with aphasia and speech pathology students via telehealth: exploring student perceptions on their clinical learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
A pre–post intervention study investigating the confidence and knowledge of health professionals communicating with people with aphasia in a metropolitan hospital
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The aphasia action, success, and knowledge programme: results from an Australian phase I trial of a speech-pathology-led intervention for people with aphasia early post stroke
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
The confidence and knowledge of health practitioners when interacting with people with aphasia in a hospital setting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Is an educational lecture a critical component of communication partner training?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Does communication partner training improve the conversation skills of speech-language pathology students when interacting with people with aphasia?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Discourse level reading comprehension interventions following acquired brain injury: a systematic review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Be clear: a new intensive speech treatment for adults with nonprogressive dysarthria
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Treating reading comprehension deficits in sub-acute brain injury rehabilitation: identifying clinical practice and management
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Participation in communication activities following traumatic brain injury: a time use diary study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Feature rich, but user-friendly: speech pathologists’ preferences for computer-based aphasia therapy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
