1 |
Texting behaviors of individuals with aphasia (Kinsey et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Texting behaviors of individuals with aphasia (Kinsey et al., 2021) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Optimising recovery in aphasia: Learning following exposure to a single dose of computer-based script training ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Optimising recovery in aphasia: Learning following exposure to a single dose of computer-based script training ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Attention in Individuals with Aphasia: Performance on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-2(nd) Edition
|
|
|
|
In: Neuropsychol Rehabil (2018)
|
|
Abstract:
Studies suggest that individuals with aphasia present with impairments in attention. However, most research has been conducted with small sample sizes using experimental protocols that lack established psychometric properties. We examined the attention performance of 114 individuals with chronic post-stroke aphasia using a standardized, norm-referenced assessment of attention, the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II (CPT-II; Conners, 2000). Participants completed the CPT-II and the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R; Kertesz, 2007). As a group, variable performance on selected CPT-II measures was observed. Participants demonstrated impairments on omissions (48.2%) and hit reaction time (67.5%), with 11.4% demonstrating atypically slow performance and over half of the sample (56.1%) performing atypically fast. The Confidence Index, a summary score, was also within the impaired range for the majority of participants. However, there were also measures in which a greater percentage of participants demonstrated performance within normal limits. There was significantly worse performance in participants with more severe (AQ < 50) compared to less severe (AQ >= 50) aphasia. No significant differences in attention were identified between participants with fluent versus non-fluent aphasia. The CPT-II is a feasible measure for persons with aphasia, which may assist in identifying attention performance deficits that potentially affect language.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6803070/ https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1460852 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29669447
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
8 |
Impact of Personal Relevance on Acquisition and Generalization of Script Training for Aphasia: A Preliminary Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Impact of Personalization on Acquisition and Generalization of Script Training: A Preliminary Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Acquisition, Maintenance and Generalization of Script Training: A Comparison of Errorful and Error-Reducing Conditions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|