| 1 |
Experimental Philosophy and the Philosophy of Language: A Defence of the Ambiguity Thesis
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this thesis I employ the experimental method to inform three important debates within the philosophy of language. These three debates can loosely be characterised as the following: Strawsonianism vs. Russellianism about the meaning of definite descriptions (Chapter 2), Millianism vs. Descriptivism about the meaning of proper names (Chapter 3), and Internalism vs. Externalism about natural kind terms (Chapter 4). To investigate these debates I use surveys to test the intuitions of ordinary language users, that is, non-philosophers, about the meaning of various terms and phrases in natural language. This included New Zealand undergraduate students, students in China, and participants in the US in order to investigate any cross-cultural differences. The results of these three studies indicate substantial variation in the intuitions held among ordinary language users. I use this variation to defend an ambiguity thesis. According to this thesis, some terms and phrases as they occur in natural language (specifically, proper names, natural kind terms, and definite descriptions) have multiple meanings associated them. No one disambiguation is correct outside of a context of utterance. If the ambiguity thesis is accepted, various philosophical puzzles disappear. I will also address a number of objections that face the general program of this thesis.
|
|
Keyword:
Ambiguity; Experimental Philosophy; Language; Philosophy
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8777
http://restrictedarchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/123456789/9074
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
