3 |
A common neural hub resolves syntactic and non-syntactic conflict through cooperation with task-specific networks.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Language Science Meets Cognitive Science: Categorization and Adaptation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Further Exploring Processing Differences Between Geometric Shapes and Shape Words
|
|
|
|
In: Electronic Theses and Dissertations (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Attention and executive control during lexical processing in aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Using a Delayed Match-to-Samples Task to Investigate the Isolated Processing of Geometric Shapes and Their Corresponding Shape Words
|
|
|
|
In: Georgia Southern University Research Symposium (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Resisting Everything Except Temptation: Evidence and an Explanation for Domain-Specific Impulsivity
|
|
|
|
In: Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Comparison of Instrumentalists and Vocalists on a Lexical Tone Perception Task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Contribution of Domain Specificity in the Highly Modular Mind
|
|
|
|
In: Robert J. Stainton (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not
|
|
|
|
In: Ermer, Elsa; Guerin, Scoft A.; Cosmides, Leda; Tooby, John; & Miller, Michael B.(2006). Theory of mind broad and narrow: Reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1, 196 - 219. UC Santa Barbara: Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6c53x1nx (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
The Case for Modularity: Sin or Salvation?
|
|
|
|
In: Evolution and Cognition ; https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000135 ; Evolution and Cognition, 2001, 7 (1), pp.46-55 (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Grammatical knowledge vs. syntactic processing in the human brain
|
|
|
|
In: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_98.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
Caramazza & Zurif (1976) demonstrated that Broca’s aphasics have difficulty understanding semantically reversible constructions where word order is the primary cue to meaning. Subsequent neuroimaging investigations have reported activations in the posterior parts of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and anterior insula/frontal operculum for syntactic complexity contrasts (e.g., Stromswold et al., 1996; Ben-Shachar et al., 2003). However, three sets of findings are problematic for the notion that Broca’s area is the “seat of syntax”. First, using a grammaticality judgment task Linebarger et al. (1983) demonstrated that syntactic knowledge is largely preserved in Broca’s aphasics. Second, the ability to process syntactically complex structures has been linked to non-linguistic abilities, like general working memory (e.g., King & Just, 1991; Gordon et al., 2002; Fedorenko et al., 2006). And third, contrasts between structured (e.g., sentences) vs. unstructured (e.g., lists of words) stimuli activate brain regions that appear to be non-overlapping with the brain regions where syntactic complexity effects typically arise (e.g., Fedorenko et al., 2010).In fact, regions sensitive to syntactic complexity respond more strongly during the processing of word lists than sentences (Fedorenko et al., in prep.). We argue that linguistic processing is accomplished by the joint engagement of two functionally and computationally distinct brain systems: i) “language regions ” on the lateral surfaces of left frontal and temporal lobes that appear to be functionally specialized for linguistic processing, showing no response to working memory
|
|
Keyword:
Domain generality; Domain specificity; fMRI; Syntactic complexity; Syntax
|
|
URL: http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_98.pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.688.5035
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
20 |
How Does the Mind Work? Insights from Biology
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.psych.nyu.edu/gary/marcusArticles/Marcus 2009 topics.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|