DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 23

1
Speech Perception in Older Adults: An Interplay of Hearing, Cognition, and Learning?
In: Front Psychol (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
One Size Does Not Fit All: Examining the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Spoken Word Recognition in Older Adults Using Eye Tracking
In: Front Psychol (2022)
BASE
Show details
3
Plastic changes in speech perception in older adults with hearing impairment following hearing aid use: a systematic review ...
Lavie, Limor; Shvartzman, Liat Shechter; Banai, Karen. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
4
Plastic changes in speech perception in older adults with hearing impairment following hearing aid use: a systematic review ...
Lavie, Limor; Shvartzman, Liat Shechter; Banai, Karen. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
Plastic changes in speech perception in older adults with hearing impairment following hearing aid use: a systematic review ...
Lavie, Limor; Shvartzman, Liat Shechter; Banai, Karen. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
6
Plastic changes in speech perception in older adults with hearing impairment following hearing aid use: a systematic review ...
Lavie, Limor; Shvartzman, Liat Shechter; Banai, Karen. - : Taylor & Francis, 2021
BASE
Show details
7
Perceptual learning
In: Sensation, perception, & attention (Hoboken, NJ, 2018), p. 755-802
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
8
Learning to decipher time-compressed speech: Robust acquisition with a slight difficulty in generalization among young adults with developmental dyslexia
Gabay, Yafit; Karni, Avi; Banai, Karen. - : Public Library of Science, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
Age, Hearing, and the Perceptual Learning of Rapid Speech
Manheim, Maayan; Lavie, Limor; Banai, Karen. - : SAGE Publications, 2018
BASE
Show details
10
The Effects of Stimulus Variability on the Perceptual Learning of Speech and Non-Speech Stimuli
Banai, Karen; Amitay, Sygal. - : Public Library of Science, 2015
Abstract: Previous studies suggest fundamental differences between the perceptual learning of speech and non-speech stimuli. One major difference is in the way variability in the training set affects learning and its generalization to untrained stimuli: training-set variability appears to facilitate speech learning, while slowing or altogether extinguishing non-speech auditory learning. We asked whether the reason for this apparent difference is a consequence of the very different methodologies used in speech and non-speech studies. We hypothesized that speech and non-speech training would result in a similar pattern of learning if they were trained using the same training regimen. We used a 2 (random vs. blocked pre- and post-testing) × 2 (random vs. blocked training) × 2 (speech vs. non-speech discrimination task) study design, yielding 8 training groups. A further 2 groups acted as untrained controls, tested with either random or blocked stimuli. The speech task required syllable discrimination along 4 minimal-pair continua (e.g., bee-dee), and the non-speech stimuli required duration discrimination around 4 base durations (e.g., 50 ms). Training and testing required listeners to pick the odd-one-out of three stimuli, two of which were the base duration or phoneme continuum endpoint and the third varied adaptively. Training was administered in 9 sessions of 640 trials each, spread over 4–8 weeks. Significant learning was only observed following speech training, with similar learning rates and full generalization regardless of whether training used random or blocked schedules. No learning was observed for duration discrimination with either training regimen. We therefore conclude that the two stimulus classes respond differently to the same training regimen. A reasonable interpretation of the findings is that speech is perceived categorically, enabling learning in either paradigm, while the different base durations are not well-enough differentiated to allow for categorization, resulting in disruption to learning.
Keyword: Research Article
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340624
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118465
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25714552
BASE
Hide details
11
The role of anchoring in auditory and speech perception in the general and dyslexic populations
In: Language processing in the brain (Malden, MA, 2012), p. 921-937
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
12
Training to Improve Hearing Speech in Noise: Biological Mechanisms
Song, Judy H.; Skoe, Erika; Banai, Karen. - : Oxford University Press, 2012
BASE
Show details
13
Training to Improve Hearing Speech in Noise: Biological Mechanisms
Song, Judy H.; Skoe, Erika; Banai, Karen. - : Oxford University Press, 2012
BASE
Show details
14
Training to Improve Hearing Speech in Noise: Biological Mechanisms
Song, Judy H.; Skoe, Erika; Banai, Karen. - : Oxford University Press, 2011
BASE
Show details
15
Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation
BASE
Show details
16
On the importance of anchoring and the consequences of its impairment in dyslexia
In: Dyslexia. - Bracknell : British Dyslexia Association 16 (2010) 3, 240-257
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
17
Perception of Speech in Noise: Neural Correlates
BASE
Show details
18
Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function
Banai, Karen; Hornickel, Jane; Skoe, Erika. - : Oxford University Press, 2009
BASE
Show details
19
Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function
Banai, Karen; Hornickel, Jane; Skoe, Erika. - : Oxford University Press, 2009
BASE
Show details
20
Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function
Banai, Karen; Hornickel, Jane; Skoe, Erika. - : Oxford University Press, 2009
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
17
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern