| 1 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the collaboration of aphasia trialists (CATs) trials for aphasia panel
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2022 to 2026 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
An aphasia research agenda – a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0268-7038 ; EISSN: 1464-5041 ; Aphasiology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03528818 ; Aphasiology, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2021, ⟨10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0039-2499 ; EISSN: 1524-4628 ; Stroke ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277820 ; Stroke, American Heart Association, 2021, 52 (5), pp.1778-1787. ⟨10.1161/strokeaha.120.031162⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Predictors of poststroke aphasia recovery: a systematic review-informed individual participant data meta-analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists.
|
|
|
|
In: Ali, Myzoon Soroli, Efstathia Jesus, Luis M. T. Cruice, Madeline Isaksen, Jytte Visch-Brink, Evy Grohmann, Kleanthes K. Jagoe, C. Kukkonen, Tarja Varlokosta, Spyridoula Hernández Sacristán, Carlos Rosell Clari, Vicent Palmer, Rebecca Martinez Ferreiro, Silvia Godecke, Erin Wallace, Sarah J. McMenamin, Ruth Copland, David Breitenstein, Caterina Bowen, Audrey Laska, Ann-Charlotte Hilari, Katerina Brady, Marian C. 2021 An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists. Aphasiology 1 21 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
RELEASE: A protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya; Le Dorze, Guylaine; Breitenstein, Caterina; Hilari, Katerina; Babbitt, Edna; Bose, Arpita; Brady, Marian; Cherney, Leora R.; Copland, David; Cruice, Madeline; Enderby, Pam; Hersh, Deborah; Howe, Tami; Kelly, Helen; Kiran, Swathi; Laska, Ann-Charlotte; Marshall, Jane; Nicholas, Marjorie; Patterson, Janet; Pearl, Gill; Rochon, Elizabeth; Rose, Miranda; Sage, Karen; Small, Steven; Webster, Janet
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
|
|
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful, and efficient outcome data. OBJECTIVE: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phases I-IV aphasia treatment studies. METHODS: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research, which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. RESULTS: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional wellbeing: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). DISCUSSION: Harmonization of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. CONCLUSION: The WAB-R, GHQ-12, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phases I-IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.
|
|
Keyword:
Aphasia; Communication Sciences and Disorders; consensus; core outcome set; methodology; recommendations; stroke
|
|
URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/5802
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Training Effectiveness in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
RELEASE: a protocol for a systematic review based, individual participant data, meta- and network meta-analysis, of complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance training effectiveness in chronic post-stroke aphasia: A randomized controlled trial protocol
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Who participates in aphasia research?: an analysis of the REhabilitation and recovery of peopLE with Aphasia after StrokE (RELEASE) data set
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
