DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 4 of 4

1
Developing a real-time translator from neural signals to text: An articulatory phonetics approach ...
Comstock, Lindy; Tankus, Ariel; Tran, Michelle. - : University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2019
BASE
Show details
2
Developing a real-time translator from neural signals to text: An articulatory phonetics approach
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2019)
BASE
Show details
3
Pragmatic Accommodation and Linguistic Salience in U.S.-Russian Political Discourse
Comstock, Lindy B. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2018
In: Comstock, Lindy B. (2018). Pragmatic Accommodation and Linguistic Salience in U.S.-Russian Political Discourse. UCLA: Applied Linguistics 0074. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6jd7j3t7 (2018)
BASE
Show details
4
Suffix interference in Russian
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 3 (2018): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 54:1–11 ; 2473-8689 (2018)
Abstract: The phenomenon of “suffix interference” has been used as evidence for a distinction between inflectional and derivational processes (e.g. Pinker & Prince, 1988; Pinker, 1999; Pinker & Ullman, 2002). Yet much of the work on affix priming exists in English, a morphologically poor language, and suffix interference appears inconsistently in cross-linguistic data. The greater reliance on morphological complexity in Russian, and its use of an infinitival suffix and aspectual affixes that may bridge the distinction between traditional definitions of inflectional and derivational word forms, call into question how generalizable the original findings on suffix interference may be for morphologically-complex languages. Investigating these questions, this paper provides unexpected findings: suffix interference is absent in Russian, inflectional suffixes reveal significantly more robust priming effects, and the infinitival suffix is best considered a special case of affix priming, failing to pattern with either inflectional or derivational suffixes. Thus, Russian appears to defy the assumption that inflections are “stripped” during morphological parsing; instead, verbal inflections prove the greatest facilitators of morphological priming. A linear mixed effects model indicates these effects cannot be explained by frequency alone.
Keyword: inflectional processing; lexical decision; linguistic processing; morphological priming; morphology; psycholinguistics; Russian; suffix interference
URL: https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4351
http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/PLSA/article/view/4351
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
4
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern