| 1 |
Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK Austerity Budget
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Actor descriptions, action attributions and argumentation : towards a systematization of critical discourse analysis analytical categories in the representation of social groups
|
|
|
|
In: Methodologies (Los Angeles, 2013), p. 187-208
|
|
MPI für Psycholinguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
A useful methodological synergy? : combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
|
|
|
|
In: Methodologies (Los Angeles, 2013), p. 1-34
|
|
MPI für Psycholinguistik
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation : towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups 1
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
CDA studies on out-groups, i.e. immigrants, within Wodak's Discourse-Historical and van Dijk's Socio-cognitive approaches along other approaches, have suggested methods and analytical categories through which discursive representations of social groups are investigated. Consequently, several listings of relevant analytical categories have been proposed and applied to many subsequent studies. However, the variety of the proposed methods in representation of social groups by various scholars and the often unclear accounts for the links among various levels of discourse analysis seem to have created a multitude of discursive strategies that can be overwhelming if not confusing. This paper is an attempt to make explicit various levels of discourse analysis on representation of social groups from detailed textual analysis to discourse topics and tries to show how micro-level analytical categories are related to macro-structure within various levels of contexts. Specifically, a three-level analytical framework is suggested for textual analysis of the representation of social groups which divides the text analysis into three domains of social actors, social actions and argumentation. It is suggested that the analysis should look at what is (not) in the text in terms of the three domains mentioned, and investigate how these domains are linguistically realized through a set of linguistic processes/mechanisms.
|
|
Keyword:
P300 Media studies; P900 Others in Mass Communications and Documentation
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453948
http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/4779/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 10 |
The Representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005).
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005)
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
British newspapers and the representations of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants between 1996 and 2006
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Papers from Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
