1 |
Rhetorical strategies used in Malay research article conclusions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Language practice and language ideology on linguistic landscape in Malaysia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The implementation of Malay language education policy and the linguistic landscape in Malaysia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Hedging in the Discussion sections of English and Malay educational research articles
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The means by which writers present a proposition as an opinion in English research articles
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Dialect phonemes incorporated into the standard Kadazandusun language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Appropriation of English as an international lingua franca (EILF) in ASEAN
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Malay ESL students’ difficulties in using English prepositions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The position of game localization training within academic translation teaching
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions : international publications versus local publications
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This paper constitutes a multidimensional explanation of an integration of genre-based knowledge and evaluative stance in the context of academic arguments employed in the conclusion sections of English and Malay research articles. For this purpose, it draws on an analysis of the features in Appraisal theory (Martin & Rose, 2003) integrated with an analysis of communicative purposes within a genre analysis framework (Swales, 1990, 2004). Among others, the findings include the observation that evaluative and dialogic stances jointly produce rhetorical effects in both English and Malay conclusions. English conclusions contain a subtle balance of assertion and mitigation while Malay conclusions tend to contract dialogic space and thus could be interpreted as less reader-friendly. This suggests that evaluation and the meaning potential of the genre are experienced and valued differently by scholars publishing in these two different scientific communities (international and local). This variation seems to be due to linguistic, contextual, and potential social cultural influences within the two academic discourse communities. The present study has pedagogical implications in the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) classroom.
|
|
Keyword:
Q Science (General)
|
|
URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/72374/1/WRAP_0380123-cal-150915-english_and_malay_research_article_conclusions_accepted_version.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004 http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/72374/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
12 |
Hedging in Academic Writing - A Pedagogically-Motivated Qualitative Study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Rhetorical patterns in the discussion sections of malay research articles
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Hedging in academic writing - a pedagogically-motivated qualitative study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Hedging in academic writing: a pedagogically-motivated qualitative study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Postulating hypotheses in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics: A qualitative investigation into rhetorical shifts and linguistic mechanisms
|
|
|
|
In: Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos ( AELFE ), ISSN 1139-7241, Nº. 27, 2014, pags. 121-141 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Research article introductions in Chinese and English: A comparative genre-based study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|