DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Hits 81 – 89 of 89

81
Obligatory reconstruction and the meaning of traces
In: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/2E5MDU5Y/motrSingle.pdf
BASE
Show details
82
On Quantifier Raising in German
In: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2009/12804/pdf/SAUERLAND_On_Quantifier_Raising_in_German.pdf
BASE
Show details
83
Decomposing Questions Acts
In: http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/fileadmin/material/40-60-puzzles-for-krifka/pdf/sauerland.pdf
BASE
Show details
84
1.1 Necessary Condition for the Licensing of Focus
In: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2009/12813/pdf/SAUERLAND_The_Content_of_Pronouns_Evidence_from_Focus.pdf
Abstract: This paper is part of an effort to learn something about the semantics of pronominals from their focus properties. At present, I believe to have evidence substantiating the following two claims: Claim 1 is that Bound Pronominals can be hidden definite descriptions, but probably need not necessarily be. Claim 2 is that donkey anaphora must be hidden definite descriptions. The evidence for Claim 1 comes from a new analysis of cases with focus on bound pronouns such as (1) that also featured in earlier work of mine (Sauerland 1998, 1999). (1) On Monday, every boy called his mother. On TUESday, every TEAcher called his/HIS mother. In particular, I show parallels of focus on bound pronouns and bound definite de-scriptions (epithets). The evidence for Claim 2 comes from cases like (2) where focus seems to be obligatory. (2) a. Every girl who came by car parked it in the lot. b. Every girl who came by bike parked #it/IT in the lot.
Keyword: c. On TUESday; JIM called SUE
URL: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2009/12813/pdf/SAUERLAND_The_Content_of_Pronouns_Evidence_from_Focus.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.555.6527
BASE
Hide details
85
A Contrast to a Trace
In: http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/TY3MTljM/wccfl01.pdf
BASE
Show details
86
No ‘No’: On the Crosslinguistic Absence of a Determiner ‘No’∗
In: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2009/12806/pdf/SAUERLAND_On_the_Crosslinguistic_Absence.pdf
BASE
Show details
87
Hardts Surprising Sloppy Readings: A Flat Binding Account ∗
In: http://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/forskning/aktuelt/arrangementer/konferanser/2007/SuB12/proceedings/sauerland_523-536.pdf
BASE
Show details
88
Hardts Surprising Sloppy Readings: A Flat Binding Account ∗
In: http://edocs.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/volltexte/2009/12748/pdf/SAUERLAND_Hardts_Surprising_Sloppy_Readings.pdf
BASE
Show details
89
Focus and the Semantic Typology of Reciprocals
In: http://languagelink.let.uu.nl/burs/RCL07/pages/handouts/sauerland.pdf
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
24
65
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern