1 |
Probabilistic effects on French [t] duration
|
|
|
|
In: http://mirjamernestus.nl/Ernestus/NCCFr/ProbEffectsFrench.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Preparing a Corpus of Dutch Spontaneous Dialogues for Automatic Phonetic Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: http://lands.let.kun.nl/literature/schuppler.2008.1.pdf (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Journal of Memory and
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.mirjamernestus.nl/Ernestus/publications/Mitterer_Yoneyama_Ernestus_2008_JML.pdf (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ualberta.ca/~baayen/publications/kupermaninterfixes.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
personal correspondence
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phonetik.uni-muenchen.de/~clakuz/Kuzla_et_al_LabPhon10.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/–lenition in Dutch
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.holgermitterer.eu/pdfs/Mitterer_Ernestus_JPhon2006.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Lexical frequency and voice assimilation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ualberta.ca/~baayen/publications/ernestusetaljasa.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Perceptual compensation for voice assimilation in German fricatives
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phonetik.uni-muenchen.de/~clakuz/Kuzla_et_al2006_SST.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Prosodic cues for morphological complexity
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/KempsEtAlLCP.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Running title:
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ualberta.ca/~baayen/publications/PluymaekersEtAlJASA.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79.5–38
|
|
|
|
In: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/language/v079/79.1ernestus.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
The recognition of reduced word forms
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ingilizceveingilizce.com/ingilizce/The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
INTERSPEECH 2010 Predicting human perception and ASR classification of word-final [t] by its acoustic sub-segmental properties
|
|
|
|
In: http://lands.let.kun.nl/literature/schuppler.2010.2.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Type Boundary location Example Translation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.lpl.univ-aix.fr/~labphon10/abstracts/162.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Running head: PROCESSING REDUCED WORD FORMS Processing reduced word forms: the sufx restoration effect
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/KempsErnestusSchreuderBaayenBL2004.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Running head: PROSODIC CUES FOR MORPHOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/KempsEtAlMC.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Running head: Unfamiliar intonation contours Address for correspondence:
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.mirjamernestus.nl/Ernestus/public/braun_dainora_ernestus_resubmission.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
This study investigates whether listeners ’ familiarity with an intonation contour affects speech processing. In three experiments, Dutch participants heard Dutch sentences with normal intonation contours and with unfamiliar ones and performed word monitoring, lexical decision, or semantic categorization tasks (the latter two with cross-modal identity priming). The unfamiliar intonation contour slowed down participants on all tasks, which demonstrates that an unfamiliar intonation contour has a robust detrimental effect on speech processing. Since cross-modal identity priming with a lexical decision task taps into lexical access, this effect obtained in this task suggests that an unfamiliar intonation contour hinders lexical access. Furthermore, results from the semantic categorization task show that the effect of an uncommon intonation contour is long-lasting and hinders subsequent processing. Hence, intonation not only contributes to (pragmatic) utterance meaning (emotion, sentence type, focus), but affects crucial aspects of the speech comprehension process and is more important than previously thought. Keywords: Intonation, speech comprehension, lexical access, cross-modal priming
|
|
Keyword:
2
|
|
URL: http://www.mirjamernestus.nl/Ernestus/public/braun_dainora_ernestus_resubmission.pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.669.6395
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
THE COMPREHENSION OF ACOUSTICALLY REDUCED MORPHOLOGICALLY COMPLEX WORDS: THE ROLES OF DELETION, DURATION, AND FRQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1091/1091.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Prosodic Structure Affects the Production and Perception of Voice-Assimilated German Fricatives
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2006/papers/sp06_148.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Word-final [t]-deletion: An analysis on the segmental and subsegmental level
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.hf.ntnu.no/isk/koreman/Publications/2009/Schuppler _et_al_Interspeech2009_IDp91050.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|