DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 29

1
The role of verb semantics in genitive alternations: genitive of negation and genitive of intensionality
In: Oslo Studies in Language, Vol 4, Iss 1 (2012) (2012)
BASE
Show details
2
Cognition, Logic and Communication Volume 6: Formal Semantics and Pragmatics: Discourse, Context, and Models
In: http://thebalticyearbook.org/journals/baltic/article/download/1580/1228/ (2011)
BASE
Show details
3
Specificational Copular Sentences in Russian and English
In: Oslo Studies in Language, Vol 2, Iss 1 (2010) (2010)
BASE
Show details
4
Lecture 11: The Russian Genitive of Negation, Existential Sentences, and Diathesis Alternation: Interaction of Lexical and Compositional Semantics 1
In: http://people.umass.edu/partee/MGU_2007/MGU077_2up.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
5
2. NP Type Multiplicity. 2
In: http://people.umass.edu/partee/NZ_2006/NZ14%20Noun%20Phrases%20and%20Type-Shifting.pdf (2006)
BASE
Show details
6
Are There Privative Adjectives?1
In: http://semarch.linguistics.fas.nyu.edu/Archive/TFlNWIzO/AreTherePrivatives.pdf (2003)
BASE
Show details
7
2002) ‘existential sentences, BE and the genitive of negation in Russian’ . Paper presented at the workshop Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Université de Nancy 2
In: https://udrive.oit.umass.edu/partee/ParteeBorschevNancy.pdf (2002)
BASE
Show details
8
The Russian Genitive of Negation in Existential Sentences: The Role of Theme-Rheme Structure Reconsidered
In: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/GenNegTravaux.pdf (2002)
BASE
Show details
9
Genitives, Relational Nouns, and the Argument-Modifier Distinction
In: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/ZASfinalNov00.PDF (2000)
BASE
Show details
10
Genitives, Relational Nouns, and Argument-Modifier Ambiguity
In: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/Oslo.pdf (2000)
BASE
Show details
11
Genitives, relational nouns, and the argument-modifier distinction [Online resource]
In: Approaching the grammar of adjuncts : proceedings of the Oslo conference, September 22-25, 1999, Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, Berlin, 1999; ZAS papers in linguistics Vol. 17 17 (2000), 177-201
Linguistik-Repository
Show details
12
Possessives, favorite, and Coercion
In: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/partee-favorite.pdf (1999)
BASE
Show details
13
Integrating Lexical And Formal Semantics: Genitives, Relational Nouns, And Type-Shifting
In: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/tbilisi17.pdf (1998)
Abstract: this paper we discuss the analysis of expressions such as John's team, John's brother, John's favorite movie, Mary's favorite chair, Mary's former mansion. Before introducing the concrete problems, we briefly describe our theoretical perspective. Our theoretical concern is the integration of formal semantics and lexical semantics, especially but not exclusively in the traditions of Montague Grammar and the Moscow School (Apresjan (1994), Mel'uk (1982), Paducheva (1996)), respectively. We have proposed (Borschev and Partee (in press)) to modify the Moscow school approach and represent lexical information in the form of sets of meaning postulates, which may or may not exhaust the meaning of the given lexical item. We believe this use of meaning postulates is consistent with actual Moscow school practice, and it makes it possible to integrate lexical semantics with the compositional "semantics of syntax" given by formal semantics. If the formal semantic interpretation of a sentence is given as a formula of intensional logic in which lexical items are primitives, and lexical semantics as a set of meaning postulates for these lexical items, then their integration can be seen as the drawing of entailments from these sources. This approach is in principle extendable to the integration of semantic interpretation with contextual and other information as well. So we semantically represent a sentence or a text as a theory consisting of different sorts of formulas, i.e. different sorts of axioms and their entailments. By "theory" here, we do not mean the metalevel linguistic theory, but the set of axioms from various sources plus the consequences that can be drawn from these axioms, which together constitute the interpretation of such a sentence in a given context. Such a theory (s.
URL: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/tbilisi17.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.37.825
BASE
Hide details
14
Formal and Lexical Semantics and the Genitive in Negated Existential Sentences in Russian
In: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~partee/docs/russian.pdf (1997)
BASE
Show details
15
Bound Variables and Other Anaphors
In: http://people.umass.edu/partee/docs/Partee78TINLAP.pdf (1978)
BASE
Show details
16
Bound Variables And Other Anaphors
In: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/T/T78/T78-1011.pdf (1975)
BASE
Show details
17
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
In: http://www.linguisticsociety.org/files/lsaam.pdf
BASE
Show details
18
Second Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation. INTEGRATING LEXICAL AND FORMAL SEMANTICS:
BASE
Show details
19
The Semantics of Russian Genitive of Negation: The Nature and Role of Perspectival Structure
In: http://ncs.ruhosting.nl/colloquium/abstracts/partee-borschev.pdf
BASE
Show details
20
Lecture 11: The Russian Genitive of Negation, Existential Sentences, and Diathesis Alternation: Interaction of Lexical and Compositional Semantics 1
In: http://people.umass.edu/partee/RGGU_2005/RGGU05Lec11BarcelonaGenNeg.pdf
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
28
1
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern