DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 22

1
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
2
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
3
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
4
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
5
The views and experiences of suicidal children and young people of mental health support services: A meta-ethnography.
BASE
Show details
6
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography : the eMERGe Reporting Guidance
BASE
Show details
7
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography : the eMERGe Reporting Guidance
BASE
Show details
8
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography : the eMERGe Reporting Guidance
BASE
Show details
9
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography : the eMERGe Reporting Guidance
BASE
Show details
10
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
11
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
12
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography: The eMERGe Reporting Guidance
Abstract: The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta‐ethnography reporting. Evidence‐based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta‐ethnography is a rigorous seven‐phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta‐ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta‐ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed‐methods design and evidence‐based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta‐ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta‐ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus‐building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta‐ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance.The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta‐ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta‐ethnography outputs to improve practice, policyand service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta‐ethnography.
Keyword: H Social Sciences (General); L Education (General); R Medicine (General); RA Public aspects of medicine; RD Surgery; RJ Pediatrics; RT Nursing
URL: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/115394/7/France_et_al-2019-Review_of_Education.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3147
http://orca.cf.ac.uk/115394/
BASE
Hide details
13
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography: The eMERGe Reporting Guidance
BASE
Show details
14
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
France, Emma; Cunningham, Maggie; Ring, Nicola. - : Wiley-Blackwell, 2019
BASE
Show details
15
Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
In: J Adv Nurs (2019)
BASE
Show details
16
Review: The views and experiences of suicidal children and young people of mental health support services: A meta-ethnography
BASE
Show details
17
Improving reporting of Meta-Ethnography The eMERGe Reporting Guidance
BASE
Show details
18
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance
BASE
Show details
19
A Critical Analysis of Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare: The Case of Asthma Action Plans
Ring, Nicola A. - : University of Stirling, 2013
BASE
Show details
20
Understanding what asthma plans mean: a linguistic analysis of terminology used in published texts
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
22
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern