| 1 |
Avoiding Gaps in Romance: Evidence from Italian and French for a Structural Parsing Principle
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1368-0005 ; EISSN: 1467-9612 ; Syntax ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03191115 ; Syntax, Wiley-Blackwell, 2021, 24 (2), pp.191-223. ⟨10.1111/synt.12209⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Experiment on complementizer-less subject relatives in English
|
|
|
|
In: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03134863 ; 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Avoiding gaps in Romance: a processing foundation for the Merge over Move principle?
|
|
|
|
In: Syntax ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03134859 ; Syntax, 2020 (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
Existing evidence suggests that the parser avoids positing a movement dependency if the grammar allows it. By investigating the processing of two syntactic ambiguities that have not been previously studied, we provide more conclusive evidence for this parsing bias in two Romance languages: French and Italian. In two acceptability judgment experiments and two self-paced reading studies, we found that sentences that involved a filler-gap dependency (indirect questions in Italian and free relatives in French) were dispreferred compared to sentences involving the same lexical material but no filler-gap dependency (declarative complement clauses in both languages). Crucially, the filler-gap dependency was not dispreferred when there was no available competitor. We discuss these results as also relevant for syntactic theory and for the questionable status of Merge over Move as a grammatical principle.
|
|
Keyword:
[SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics
|
|
URL: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03134859
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Whatever His Arguments, Whatever Relatives Are Not Free Relatives: A Reply to Caponigro’s Reply
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0024-3892 ; EISSN: 1530-9150 ; Linguistic Inquiry ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03039377 ; Linguistic Inquiry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press), 2020, pp.1-50. ⟨10.1162/ling_a_00413⟩ (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Object relative clauses: An unexpected difference between children and adults.
|
|
|
|
In: 12th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA) ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01428338 ; 12th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA), 2015, Nantes, Unknown Region (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Object relative clauses: explaining an unexpected difference between children and adults.
|
|
|
|
In: The Romance Turn VII (TRT) ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01428337 ; The Romance Turn VII (TRT), 2015, Venise, Unknown Region (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Object relative clauses. an unexpected difference between children and adults
|
|
|
|
In: GALA ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01822544 ; GALA, Sep 2015, Nantes, France (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
