DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 6 of 6

1
Structural, Functional, and Processing Perspectives on Linguistic Island Effects
In: EISSN: 2333-9691 ; Annual Review of Linguistics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03506510 ; Annual Review of Linguistics, Annual Reviews, 2022, 8 (1), ⟨10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030319⟩ (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction
In: Prof. Gibson (2022)
BASE
Show details
3
French subject island ? empirical studies of dont and de qui.
In: ISSN: 0959-2695 ; EISSN: 1474-0079 ; Journal of French Language Studies ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03134865 ; Journal of French Language Studies, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2020, 30 (3), pp.275-300. ⟨10.1017/S0959269520000137⟩ (2020)
Abstract: International audience ; Dont has been claimed to be an exception to the 'subject island' constraint (Tellier, 1991; Sportiche and Bellier, 1989; Heck, 2009) and to contrast with true relative pronouns such as de qui. We provide corpus data from a literary corpus (Frantext), which show that relativizing out of the subject is possible with dont and de qui in French relative clauses, and is even the most frequent use of both relative clauses. We show that it is not a recent innovation by comparing subcorpora from the beginning of the twentieth century and from the beginning of the twenty-first century. We also show, with an acceptability judgement task, that extraction out of the subject with de qui is well accepted. Why has this possibility been overlooked? We suggest that it may be because de qui relatives in general are less frequent than dont relatives (about 60 times less in our corpus). Turning to de qui interrogatives, we show that extraction out of the subject is not attested, and propose an explanation of the contrast with relative clauses. We conclude that in this respect, French does not seem to differ from other Romance language
Keyword: [SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269520000137
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03134865
BASE
Hide details
4
The acceptability of extractions from subjects depends on the discourse status of the subject
In: Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03100814 ; Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, Sep 2020, Potsdam, Germany (2020)
BASE
Show details
5
Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction
In: ISSN: 0010-0277 ; EISSN: 1873-7838 ; Cognition ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03100856 ; Cognition, Elsevier, 2020, 204, pp.104293. ⟨10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293⟩ (2020)
BASE
Show details
6
The French de-phrases as noun expansion ...
Winckel, Elodie. - : Unpublished, 2014
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
6
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern