DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 8 of 8

1
Transposed word effect and presentation pairing ...
Elsherif, Mahmoud. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Transposed word effect and integration ...
Elsherif, Mahmoud. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
Korean orthographic processing in same-different task ...
Rastle, Kathleen. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
4
Transposed word effect and RSVP ...
Elsherif, Mahmoud. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
How orthographic-specific characteristics shape letter position coding: The case of Thai script
In: School of Health and Human Sciences (2017)
BASE
Show details
6
Masked suffix priming and morpheme positional constraints
Abstract: Although masked stem priming (e.g., dealer–DEAL) is one of the most established effects in visual word identification (e.g., Grainger et al., 1991), it is less clear whether primes and targets sharing a suffix (e.g., kindness–WILDNESS) also yield facilitation (Giraudo & Grainger, 2003; Duñabeitia et al., 2008). In a new take on this issue, we show that prime nonwords facilitate lexical decisions to target words ending with the same suffix (sheeter¬–TEACHER) compared to a condition where the critical suffix was substituted by another one (sheetal–TEACHER) or by an unrelated non–morphological ending (sheetub– TEACHER). We also show that this effect is genuinely morphological, as no priming emerged in non–complex items with the same orthographic characteristics (sportel–BROTHEL vs. sportic–BROTHEL vs. sportur–BROTHEL). In a further experiment, we took advantage of these results to assess whether suffixes are recognized in a position–specific fashion. Masked suffix priming did not emerge when the relative order of stems and suffixes was reversed in the prime nonwords—ersheet did not yield any time saving in the identification of teacher as compared to either alsheet or obsheet. We take these results to show that –er was not identified as a morpheme in ersheet, thus indicating that suffix identification is position specific. This conclusion is in line with data on interference effects in nonword rejection (Crepaldi, Rastle, & Davis, 2010), and strongly constrains theoretical proposals on how complex words are identified. In particular, because these findings were reported in a masked priming paradigm, they suggest that positional constraints operate early, most likely at a pre–lexical level of morpho–orthographic analysis
Keyword: masked suffix priming; position coding; Settore M-PSI/01 - Psicologia Generale; suffix identification; visual word identification
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11767/14601
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1027713
BASE
Hide details
7
Seeing stems everywhere: Position-independent identification of stem morphemes
BASE
Show details
8
The overlap model: A model of letter position coding
In: http://www.uv.es/~mperea/overlapPsychReview.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
8
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern