| 1 |
Is Phonology Embodied? Evidence from Mechanical Stimulation
|
|
|
|
In: J Psycholinguist Res (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Phonology and phonetics—linked, but distinct: Evidence from dyslexia ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Infants differentially extract rules from language
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Public misconceptions about dyslexia: The role of intuitive psychology
|
|
|
|
In: PLoS One (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Commentary: “An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind”—UG Is Still a Viable Hypothesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The double identity of linguistic doubling
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Across languages, certain linguistic forms are systematically preferred to others (e.g., blog > lbog), but whether such preferences reflect abstract linguistic principles or the sensorimotor demands associated with the encoding of linguistic stimuli is unknown. To inform this debate, here we examine whether the preferences for linguistic forms can be disentangled from their sensorimotor characteristics. Our results demonstrate that people’s linguistic preferences doubly dissociate from the demands exacted by the linguistic stimulus: A single stimulus can elicit diverse percepts, whereas each such percept can remain invariant despite radical changes to stimulus modality—speech and signs. These conclusions are in line with the possibility that linguistic principles are amodal and abstract.
|
|
Keyword:
Social Sciences
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5137774/
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613749113
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
