| 1 |
Predictive inference in reading comprehension: What can biased judgments inform us about information processing in the brain?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Syntax and semantics: Similarities in late positive components
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not
|
|
|
|
In: Springer US (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Implicit learning of distributional patterns in linguistic and non-linguistic sequence production
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Tracking Keystroke Sequences at the Cortical Level Reveals the Dynamics of Serial Order Production
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0898-929X ; EISSN: 1530-8898 ; Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02093896 ; Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press), 2019, 31 (7), pp.1030-1043. ⟨10.1162/jocn_a_01401⟩ (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Getting more out of working memory: Stacking verbal relational role-bindings
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Maintenance Versus Transmission Deficits: The Effect of Delay on Naming Performance in Aphasia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
The role of memory processes and quality of lexical representations in native and non-native reading comprehension
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This dissertation investigated what memory mechanisms support parsing and how they constrain sentence comprehension during first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) sentence reading. Although two memory-based accounts in sentence processing research, the capacity-based model (Just & Carpenter, 1992; King & Just, 1991) and the cue-based retrieval model (McElree & Vasishth, 2005; McElree, Vasishth, & Van Dyke, 2006; Nicenboim & Vasishth, 2018), demonstrated memory mechanisms supporting sentence comprehension, how readers access linguistic representations outside focal attention during reading is a largely unresolved issue, especially in L2 processing. Thus, the current research compared the predictions of the cue-based retrieval model and the capacity-based model in sentence comprehension using eye-tracking. Based on previous evidence for the cue-based retrieval model, this dissertation also examined whether enhancing the quality of lexical representations through semantic elaboration influences retrieval efficiency, given the assumption that providing additional semantic information for the target and/or the distractor increases the uniqueness of the target representation in memory by reducing similarity-based retrieval interference. Importantly, in order to understand whether the ability to use an efficient, cue-driven operation determines skilled versus less-skilled reading, L1 and L2 speakers’ reading patterns were compared. The findings that both L1 and L2 readers were sensitive to similarity-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension suggest that sentence processing relies on a series of cue-based retrievals, but the ability to employ this operation itself may not distinguish skilled reading from less-skilled reading. In particular, the observed L1-L2 differences in reading patterns suggest that the most likely predictor of reading ability may be individuals’ quality of lexical representation.
|
|
Keyword:
cue-based retrieval; quality of lexical representations; second language reading; similarity-based retrieval interference
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/105148
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Explicit and implicit learning of verb bias using reversal learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Individual differences in syntactic processing during reading: a psycholinguist’s “two disciplines” problem
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Optimal nonlinear control and estimation using global domain linearization
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Precursors and downstream consequences of prediction in language comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
