DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 14 of 14

1
Drifting pitch awareness after exposure to altered auditory feedback ...
Franken, Matthias. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Analysis scripts: Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control ...
Franken, Matthias. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
The role of source monitoring in sensory feedback during speech production ...
Franken, Matthias; Hartsuiker, Robert; Johansson, Petter. - : Open Science Framework, 2020
BASE
Show details
4
The role of source monitoring in sensory feedback during speech production ...
Franken, Matthias; Hartsuiker, Robert; Johansson, Petter. - : Open Science Framework, 2020
BASE
Show details
5
Speaking with an alien voice: Flexible sense of agency during vocal production ...
Franken, Matthias; Hartsuiker, Robert; Johansson, Petter. - : Open Science Framework, 2020
BASE
Show details
6
Does passive sound attenuation affect auditory feedback processing? ...
Franken, Matthias. - : Open Science Framework, 2019
BASE
Show details
7
Listening for speaking : investigations of the relationship between speech perception and production
Franken, Matthias K.. - [s.l.] : [S.n.], 2018
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
8
Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways ...
Abstract: When talking, speakers continuously monitor and use the auditory feedback of theirown voice to control and inform speech production processes. When speakers areprovided with auditory feedback that is perturbed in real time, most of themcompensate for this by opposing the feedback perturbation. But some speakers followthe perturbation. In the current study we investigated whether the state of the speechsystem at perturbation onset may determine what type of response (opposing orfollowing) is given. The results suggest that whether a perturbation-related response isopposing or following depends on ongoing fluctuations of the speech system: The motorsystem initially responds by doing the opposite of what it was doing. This effect and thenon-trivial proportion of following responses suggest that current production modelsare inadequate: They need to account for why responses to unexpected sensoryfeedback depend on the production-system’s state at the time of perturbation. ...
Keyword: Cognition and Perception; Cognitive Neuroscience; FOS Languages and literature; FOS Psychology; Life Sciences; Linguistics; Neuroscience and Neurobiology; Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics; Psychology; Social and Behavioral Sciences
URL: https://psyarxiv.com/tskxq/
https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/tskxq
BASE
Hide details
9
Effects of auditory feedback consistency on vowel production ...
BASE
Show details
10
Effects of auditory feedback consistency on vowel production ...
BASE
Show details
11
Following and Opposing responses to Perturbed Auditory Feedback ...
BASE
Show details
12
Following and Opposing responses to Perturbed Auditory Feedback ...
BASE
Show details
13
Assessing the link between speech perception and production through individual differences ...
BASE
Show details
14
Assessing the link between speech perception and production through individual differences ...
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
13
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern