1 |
An empirical investigation of parent-child shared reading of digital personalized books
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Infants Attend Longer to Controlling versus Supportive Directive Speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Infants attend longer to controlling versus supportive directive speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Early developmental changes in the timing of turn-taking: a longitudinal study of mother–infant interaction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
The dimensional arrow: agreement in directional mapping of dimensions among Mandarin Chinese- and English-speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Acoustic differences between humorous and sincere communicative intentions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Humor, abstraction, and disbelief
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We investigated humor as a context for learning about abstraction and disbelief. More specifically, we investigated how parents support humor understanding during book sharing with their toddlers. In Study 1, a corpus analysis revealed that in books aimed at 1-to 2-year-olds, humor is found more often than other forms of doing the wrong thing including mistakes, pretense, lying, false beliefs, and metaphors. In Study 2, 20 parents read a book containing humorous and non-humorous pages to their 19-to 26-month-olds. Parents used a significantly higher percentage of high abstraction extra-textual utterances (ETUs) when reading the humorous pages. In Study 3, 41 parents read either a humorous or non-humorous book to their 18-to 24-month-olds. Parents reading the humorous book made significantly more ETUs coded for a specific form of high abstraction: those encouraging disbelief of prior utterances. Sharing humorous books thus increases toddlers' exposure to high abstraction and belief-based language.
|
|
URL: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/5601/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
17 |
Are “late-signing” deaf children “mindblind”? Understanding goal directedness in imitation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|