| 1 |
FFA and OFA encode distinct types of face identity information
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Trait evaluations of faces and voices: Comparing within- and between-person variability.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Comparing unfamiliar voice and face identity perception using identity sorting tasks.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Faces and voices in the brain: A modality-general person-identity representation in superior temporal sulcus
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The effects of high variability training on voice identity learning.
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
High variability training has been shown to benefit the learning of new face identities. In three experiments, we investigated whether this is also the case for voice identity learning. In Experiment 1a, we contrasted high variability training sets - which included stimuli extracted from a number of different recording sessions, speaking environments and speaking styles - with low variability stimulus sets that only included a single speaking style (read speech) extracted from one recording session (see Ritchie & Burton, 2017 for faces). Listeners were tested on an old/new recognition task using read sentences (i.e. test materials fully overlapped with the low variability training stimuli) and we found a high variability disadvantage. In Experiment 1b, listeners were trained in a similar way, however, now there was no overlap in speaking style or recording session between training sets and test stimuli. Here, we found a high variability advantage. In Experiment 2, variability was manipulated in terms of the number of unique items as opposed to number of unique speaking styles. Here, we contrasted the high variability training sets used in Experiment 1a with low variability training sets that included the same breadth of styles, but fewer unique items; instead, individual items were repeated (see Murphy, Ipser, Gaigg, & Cook, 2015 for faces). We found only weak evidence for a high variability advantage, which could be explained by stimulus-specific effects. We propose that high variability advantages may be particularly pronounced when listeners are required to generalise from trained stimuli to different-sounding, previously unheard stimuli. We discuss these findings in the context of mechanisms thought to underpin advantages for high variability training.
|
|
Keyword:
Adult; Auditory Perception; Female; High variability training; Humans; Learning; Male; Person perception; Psychology; Recognition; Social Perception; Speech Perception; Voice; Voice identity; Voice learning; Young Adult
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104026
https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/72569
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Listeners form average-based representations of individual voice identities.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Flexible voices: Identity perception from variable vocal signals.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
You talkin' to me? Communicative talker gaze activates left-lateralized superior temporal cortex during perception of degraded speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Group and individual variability in speech production networks during delayed auditory feedback
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The social code of speech prosody must be specific and generalizable.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
You talkin' to me? Communicative talker gaze activates left-lateralized superior temporal cortex during perception of degraded speech.
|
|
|
|
In: Neuropsychologia (2017) (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Increased discriminability of authenticity from multimodal laughter is driven by auditory information.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Cohesion and joint speech: right hemisphere contributions to synchronized vocal production
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Getting the Cocktail Party Started: Masking Effects in Speech Perception.
|
|
|
|
In: J Cogn Neurosci , 28 (3) pp. 483-500. (2016) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Laugh Like You Mean It: Authenticity Modulates Acoustic, Physiological and Perceptual Properties of Laughter
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior , 40 (2) pp. 133-149. (2016) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Impaired generalization of speaker identity in the perception of familiar and unfamiliar voices.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Getting the Cocktail Party Started: Masking Effects in Speech Perception
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Individual Differences in Laughter Perception Reveal Roles for Mentalizing and Sensorimotor Systems in the Evaluation of Emotional Authenticity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
