DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 15 of 15

1
The effects of recording devices and software on phonetic analysis ...
Sanker, Chelsea. - : Zenodo, 2021
BASE
Show details
2
The effects of recording devices and software on phonetic analysis ...
Sanker, Chelsea. - : Zenodo, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
Convergence Doesn't Show Lexically-Specific Phonetic Detail
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology; Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Meeting on Phonology ; 2377-3324 (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
Lexical ambiguity and acoustic distance in discrimination
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 431–445 ; 2473-8689 (2020)
BASE
Show details
5
Limitations of difference-in-difference for measuring convergence
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 10, No 1 (2019); 15 ; 1868-6354 (2019)
Abstract: Linguistic convergence is the phenomenon in which interlocutors’ speech characteristics become more similar to each other’s. One of the methods frequently used to measure convergence is the difference-in-difference (DID) approach, comparing change in absolute distance between a subject and an interlocutor or model talker. We show that this approach is not a reliable measure of convergence when the starting values of the subject and the interlocutor or model talker are close, which can result in the measurement of apparent divergence, while extreme starting points can result in overestimation of convergence. These biases are of particular concern in studies that look for individual differences in convergence. We propose an alternative approach, linear combination, which does not have the same biases, and demonstrate the advantages of this method using data from convergence studies of four linguistic characteristics and simulated data.
Keyword: Convergence; Difference-in-difference; individual differences; methodology; phonetics; psycholinguistics
URL: https://www.journal-labphon.org/jms/article/view/200
https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.200
BASE
Hide details
6
Data for: Influence of coda stop features on perceived vowel duration ...
Sanker, Chelsea. - : Mendeley, 2019
BASE
Show details
7
Data for: Influence of coda stop features on perceived vowel duration ...
Sanker, Chelsea. - : Mendeley, 2019
BASE
Show details
8
The Organization of Lexicons: a Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Monosyllabic Words ...
Yang, Shiying; Sanker, Chelsea; Priva, Uriel Cohen. - : University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
The Organization of Lexicons: a Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Monosyllabic Words
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2018)
BASE
Show details
10
Patterns Of Misperception Of Arabic Guttural And Non-Guttural Consonants
Sanker, Chelsea. - 2016
BASE
Show details
11
Comparison of Phonetic Convergence in Multiple Measures ...
Sanker, Chelsea. - : Zenodo, 2016
BASE
Show details
12
Comparison of Phonetic Convergence in Multiple Measures ...
Sanker, Chelsea. - : Zenodo, 2016
BASE
Show details
13
Patterns of Misperception of Arabic Consonants
In: Sanker, Chelsea. (2015). Patterns of Misperception of Arabic Consonants. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 41(41), 447 - 472. doi:10.20354/B4414110017. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1s70009v (2015)
BASE
Show details
14
A cross-linguistic investigation of articulatory coordination in word-initial consonant clusters ...
BASE
Show details
15
A cross-linguistic investigation of articulatory coordination in word-initial consonant clusters ...
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
15
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern