1 |
The Mystery of Early Taxonomic Development
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Verbal working memory capacity modulates category representation. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Verbal working memory capacity modulates category representation. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Investigating semantic priming in adulthood: differential contribution of subtypes of thematic relatedness
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Second place in poster competition at CogFest ; There are at least two types of semantic relations important for understanding cognitive development: taxonomic and thematic relations. Until recently, the literature focused primarily on the importance of taxonomic relations, or relations based on shared features (DOG – CAT), as it was believed that thematic relations (DOG – LEASH) only play a dominant role early in childhood (e.g. Inhelder & Piaget, 1964; Smiley and Brown, 1979). The lack of investigation has led to inconsistencies in defining thematic relations among researchers. The goal of the present study was to compare the effects of different types of thematic relations within the same experimental paradigm. We employed a lexical decision task in adults to compare priming effects of four types of thematic relations: attributive (FLY - WINGS), argument (BEAR - FISH), coordinate (CHAIR – TABLE), and locative (BEAR – FOREST) (Jouravlev, & McRae). We found significant priming effects for coordinate and locative relations. However, there were no priming effects for attributive and argument relations. Our results call for the further investigation of thematic relations and have the potential to further our understanding of the nature of thematic relatedness. ; No embargo ; Academic Major: Psychology
|
|
Keyword:
Semantic Priming; Thematic relatedness; Thematic subtypes
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/87511
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
8 |
How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Categories, Concepts, and Conceptual Development
|
|
|
|
In: Lang Cogn Neurosci (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Linguistic Labels, Dynamic Visual Features, and Attention in Infant Category Learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Role of Linguistic Labels in Infants' Categorization: An Eye Tracking Study
|
|
|
|
In: Deng, Sophia; & Sloutsky, Vladimir. (2012). The Role of Linguistic Labels in Infants' Categorization: An Eye Tracking Study. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 34(34). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7qg6f8h1 (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Effects of Categorical Labels on Similarity Judgments: A Critical Evaluation of a Critical Analysis: Comment on Noles and Gelman ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Effects of Categorical Labels on Similarity Judgments: A Critical Evaluation of a Critical Analysis: Comment on Noles and Gelman ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
The Role of Linguistic Labels in Infants' Categorization: An Eye Tracking Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Linguistic labels: Conceptual markers or object features? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Linguistic labels: Conceptual markers or object features? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|