| 1 |
How does orthographic or phonological similarity produce repetition blindness? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
How does orthographic or phonological similarity produce repetition blindness? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Errors may not cue recall of corrective feedback: evidence against the mediation hypothesis of the testing effect
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Repetition priming and repetition blindness: effects of an intervening distractor word
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The curious case of spillover: does it tell us much about saccade timing in reading?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Brandname confusion: subjective and objective measures of orthographic similarity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
University students named a 72-ms masked target word that was preceded by two 120-ms consecutively presented words, a prime word followed by a distractor. In Experiment 1, all words were in lowercase letters, whereas in Experiment 2, the target word was changed to uppercase letters. In both experiments there was an accuracy and latency cost (repetition blindness: RB) when the prime was the same word as the target, with the cost much less severe in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. A low-frequency distractor impaired target identification compared with a high-frequency distractor. Distractor frequency interacted with target frequency such that high-frequency targets preceded by low-frequency distractors had the lowest accuracy. The results are consistent with a frequency-dependent competition for access to working memory among briefly displayed words. However, there was no clear evidence that effects of target repetition on interword competition play a role in RB. The effects of a letter case change for the target are consistent with a contribution of token distinctiveness to word-order recovery in the intervening-word priming task.
|
|
Keyword:
1201 Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology; 3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; Attention; Lexical processing; Repetition priming
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:688246
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 9 |
The role of lexical expertise in reading homophones.
|
|
|
|
In: Brain and Mind Institute Researchers' Publications (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Masked form priming is moderated by the size of the letter-order-free orthographic neighbourhood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Masked priming by misspellings: Word frequency moderates the effects of SOA and prime–target similarity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Repetition in visual word identification: benefits and costs
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Spelling recognition after exposure to misspellings: implications for abstractionist vs. episodic theories of orthographic representations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Reading and spelling in adults: Are there lexical and sub-lexical subtypes?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Are word representations abstract or instance-based? Effects of spelling inconsistency in orthographic learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
T1 difficulty affects the AB: Manipulating T1 word frequency and T1 orthographic neighbor frequency
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
