1 |
Looking at the Pragmatics of Laughter
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol 43, iss 43 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Local Alignment of Frame of Reference Assignment in English and Swedish Dialogue
|
|
|
|
In: Conference papers (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Towards a Computational Model of Frame of Reference Alignment in Swedish Dialogue
|
|
|
|
In: Conference papers (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Linguistic indicators of severity and profess in online text-based therapy for depression
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Using conversation topics for predicting therapy outcomes in schizophrenia.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Using Conversation Topics for Predicting Therapy Outcomes in Schizophrenia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The prosody of Bemba relative clauses: a case study of the syntax-phonology interface in Dynamic Syntax
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions
|
|
|
|
In: Dialogue & Discourse; Vol 2 No 1 (2011); 279-311 ; 2152-9620 (2011)
|
|
Abstract:
Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions (CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.We present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dialogue phenomenon: almost 20% of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with nearly 3% being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic ‘constituents’; however, some systematic differences between same- and cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially introducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people’s expectations about who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or ‘party’.Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constituents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organization of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context.
|
|
URL: https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/dad/article/view/10753 https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2011.111
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
Tracking Lexical and Syntactic Alignment in Conversation
|
|
|
|
In: Howes, Christine; Healey, Patrcik G.T.; & Purver, Matthew. (2010). Tracking Lexical and Syntactic Alignment in Conversation. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 32(32). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/42m4n7n0 (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|