2 |
My English sounds better than yours: Second-language learners perceive their own accent as better than that of their peers
|
|
|
|
In: PLOS One (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The Role of Segmental Information in Syntactic Processing Through the Syntax–Prosody Interface ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
The Role of Segmental Information in Syntactic Processing Through the Syntax–Prosody Interface ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
sj-pdf-1-las-10.1177_0023830920974401 – Supplemental material for The Role of Segmental Information in Syntactic Processing Through the Syntax–Prosody Interface ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
sj-pdf-1-las-10.1177_0023830920974401 – Supplemental material for The Role of Segmental Information in Syntactic Processing Through the Syntax–Prosody Interface ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
My English sounds better than yours: Second-language learners perceive their own accent as better than that of their peers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Datasets on the production and perception of underlying and epenthetic glottal stops in Maltese
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The singleton-geminate distinction can be rate dependent: Evidence from Maltese
|
|
|
|
In: Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology; Vol 9, No 1 (2018); 6 ; 1868-6354 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
A time course of prosodic modulation in phonological inferencing: The case of Korean post-obstruent tensing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Surface forms trump underlying representations in functional generalisations in speech perception: the case of German devoiced stops ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Surface forms trump underlying representations in functional generalisations in speech perception: the case of German devoiced stops ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
How does cognitive load influence speech perception? : An encoding hypothesis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Phonetic category recalibration : What are the categories? ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Phonetic category recalibration : What are the categories? ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Listeners use lexical or visual context information to recalibrate auditory speech perception. After hearing an ambiguous auditory stimulus between /aba/ and /ada/ coupled with a clear visual stimulus (e.g., lip closure in /aba/), an ambiguous auditory-only stimulus is perceived in line with the previously seen visual stimulus. What remains unclear, however, is what exactly listeners are recalibrating: phonemes, phone sequences, or acoustic cues. To address this question we tested generalization of visually-guided auditory recalibration to (1) the same phoneme contrast cued differently (i.e., /aba/-/ada/ vs. /ibi/-/idi/ where the main cues are formant transitions in the vowels vs. burst and frication of the obstruent), (2) a different phoneme contrast cued identically (/aba/-/ada/ vs. /ama/-/ana/ both cued by formant transitions in the vowels), and (3) the same phoneme contrast with the same cues in a different acoustic context (/aba/-/ada/ vs. /ubu/-/udu/). Whereas recalibration was robust for all ...
|
|
Keyword:
170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified; FOS Psychology
|
|
URL: https://kilthub.cmu.edu/articles/Phonetic_category_recalibration_What_are_the_categories_/6617585/1 https://dx.doi.org/10.1184/r1/6617585.v1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|