1 |
Evidence of an advantage in visuo-spatial memory for bilingual compared to monolingual speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Bilingual children show an advantage in controlling verbal interference during spoken language comprehension*
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Language switching in bilingual production: Empirical data and computational modelling
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
A bilingual advantage in controlling language interference during sentence comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Contrasting Effects of Vocabulary Knowledge on Temporal and Parietal Brain Structure across Lifespan
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Contrasting Effects of Vocabulary Knowledge on Temporal and Parietal Brain Structure across Lifespan
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Neuronal Activation for Semantically Reversible Sentences
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Semantically reversible sentences are prone to misinterpretation and take longer for typically developing children and adults to comprehend; they are also particularly problematic for those with language difficulties such as aphasia or Specific Language Impairment. In our study we used fMRI to compare the processing of semantically reversible and nonreversible sentences in 41 healthy participants to identify how semantic reversibility influences neuronal activation. By including several linguistic and nonlinguistic conditions within our paradigm, we were also able to test whether the processing of semantically reversible sentences places additional load on sentence-specific processing, such as syntactic processing and syntactic-semantic integration, or on phonological working memory. Our results identified increased activation for reversible sentences in a region on the left temporal–parietal boundary, which was also activated when the same group of participants carried out an articulation task which involved saying “one, three” repeatedly. We conclude that the processing of semantically reversible sentences places additional demands on the subarticulation component of phonological working memory.
|
|
Keyword:
Article
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19445603 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2860570 https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21277
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Integrating Connectionist Learning and Dynamic Processing: Case Studies in Speech and Lexical Development
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|