| 1 |
Multiagent Dynamics of Gradual Argumentation Semantics
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03584238 ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022), May 2022, Auckland (virtual), New Zealand (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Multiagent Dynamics of Gradual Argumentation Semantics
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03584238 ; 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2022), May 2022, Auckland (virtual), New Zealand (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
PROTECT: A Pipeline for Propaganda Detection and Classification
|
|
|
|
In: CLiC-it 2021- Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03417019 ; CLiC-it 2021- Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, Jan 2022, Milan, Italy (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Towards Parallel Algorithms for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Arguing About “COVID” ; Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts as a “COVID-19 Death”
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy ; Enrichments and Their Use for Manipulating Commitments
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy: Enrichments and Their Use for Manipulating Commitments
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 13 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
More than Relata Refero: Representing the Various Roles of Reported Speech in Argumentative Discourse
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 59 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Questions in argumentative dialogue
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Pragmatics ; 188 (2022). - S. 56-79. - Elsevier. - ISSN 0378-2166. - eISSN 1879-1387 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
“I want you to defend that!” The Argumentative Structure of U.S.A. Presidential Debates
|
|
|
|
In: Doctoral Dissertations (2022)
|
|
Abstract:
In this dissertation, I analyze U.S.A. presidential debates as a communicative arena where candidates attempt to persuade the electorate to vote for them. The study is based on discourse analysis grounded in pragma-dialectics and conversational epistemics and deontics to I elucidate how talk on U.S.A. presidential debates is structured. I show that candidates advance a pragmatic argumentative structure tied to the act of making a campaign promise and based on four distinct epistemic resources. Drawing on the first debates from 2000, 2008 and 2016, I show how candidates shape their speech to manage the disagreement space between themselves and the audience. Candidates discursively construct the relevant facts and delineate territories of knowledge by invoking epistemic resources and through the careful use of the epistemic modality. They manage their political commitments through the use of the deontic modality and commitment markers. Using these two aspects, candidates show that there is a problem and that they are the only person going to implement a desired policy. This results in a complex argumentative structure based on three distinct premises and six critical questions which defines the discourse in this arena of communication. First, there is a necessity premise, used to stress that some course of action has to be followed, which is checked through two critical questions: a) does the course of action solve a problem? and b) does the course of action have positive effects? Second, there is a commitment premise, used to stress that the speaker will enact the proposed course of action. Two critical questions are used to check the reasonableness of this premise: c) does the candidate intend to enact this course of action? and d) is the candidate able to enact this course of action? Last, there is a comparison premise, used to stress that the opponent will not enact the desired course of action. The critical questions which are tied to this premise are: e) is the candidate the only one to propose the desired policy? and f) is the opponent not able to execute this policy?
|
|
Keyword:
argumentation; deontics; epistemics; Interpersonal and Small Group Communication; political communication; pragmatics; Social Influence and Political Communication; Speech and Rhetorical Studies; U.S.A. presidential debates
|
|
URL: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/2453
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3530&context=dissertations_2
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Inferring Inferences: Relational Propositions for Argument Mining
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Discourse Processes between Reason and Emotion
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-03470338 ; Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, 978-3-030-70091-1. ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-70091-1⟩ ; https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-70091-1#about (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Nom collectif, syntagme défini pluriel : enjeux sémantiques et argumentatifs de la référence plurielle
|
|
|
|
In: Colloque Langue et Discours 2021 La référence : (co-)construction et exploitation ; https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-03286579 ; Colloque Langue et Discours 2021 La référence : (co-)construction et exploitation, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Mar 2021, Grenoble, France ; https://led2021.sciencesconf.org/ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
La théorie de la polyphonie et des stéréotypes au service de l’analyse contrastive des opérateurs discursifs
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1699-4949 ; Çédille, revista de estudios franceses ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03225729 ; Çédille, revista de estudios franceses, Elsevier Scopus, 2021, pp.541-573 ; https://www.ull.es/revistas/index.php/cedille/article/view/1928/1658 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
L’argumentation, entre langue et texte
|
|
|
|
In: Énonciation et Argumentation ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03372621 ; Énonciation et Argumentation, Université de Passo Fundo; Université Fédérale de Santa Catarina; Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Oct 2021, Paris, France (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Irony, pretense and the divided ethos ; La feintise de l’ironiste ou l’ethos désaccordé
|
|
|
|
In: (Dés)accords. À la recherche de la différence propice. ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03282370 ; Basso Pier Luigi. (Dés)accords. À la recherche de la différence propice., 2021, Actes du Congrès de l'AFS 2019, ISBN : 979-10-95835-02-8 ; http://afsemio.fr/publications/actes_congres/ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
#publicitésociétale: quand le numérique devient un outil de sensibilisation
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1023-2044 ; Bulletin suisse de Linguistique appliquée ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03502387 ; Bulletin suisse de Linguistique appliquée, Neuchâtel : Institut de linguistique de l'Université, 2021 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
