| 1 |
A three-stage model for implementing focused written corrective feedback
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Focused direct corrective feedback: Effects on the elementary English learners’ written syntactic complexity
|
|
|
|
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 132-150 (2021) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
ЛІНГВОДИДАКТИЧНА КОНТРОЛЬНО-ОЦІНЮВАЛЬНА CТРАТЕГІЯ У ПРОЦЕСІ НАВЧАННЯ ЯК СПІЛКУВАННЯ ; LINGUODIDACTIC ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN COMMUNICATIVE EDUCATION
|
|
|
|
In: Ars linguodidacticae; № 1 (2017); 4-10 ; ARS LINGUODIDACTICAE; № 1 (2017): Ars linguodidacticae; 4-10 ; 2663-0303 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
The Effects of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedbacks on the Business Communication Texts of Technical University Students in Ghana
|
|
|
|
In: Applied Linguistics Research Journal, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 25-39 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback on KFL Learners’ Writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving the grammatical accuracy of Omani EFL learners
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
ABSTRACT This research examined the effectiveness of direct and indirect written CF on improving the grammatical accuracy of Omani EFL students regarding two newly-learned linguistic structures: the comparative and prepositions of space. The research employed mixed methods whereby a quasi-experiment and think aloud protocol (TAP) were used to answer various questions about written CF. In the quasi-experiment, the participants were assigned to a control group and two treatment groups: 1) one group received direct corrections written above their errors and 2) one group received the underlining of errors only. Since the linguistic structures had not been previously introduced to the participants of this study, the researcher provided the students with an instruction lesson on them, a week prior to the data collection. A week later, the students received a pre-test and subsequent revision, where they were asked to revise their initial task. Three days after the revision, the students performed a new task focused on the same linguistic structure (immediate post-test) to measure the short-term learning effect of the written CF. The delayed post-tests were administered six weeks after the pre-test in order to measure the long-term effect of the treatment. In all of the tests, the students were required to describe pictures. The findings of the quasi-experiment show that the direct and indirect written CF improved the grammatical accuracy of the students during revision for both linguistic structures, but a significant effect was found for direct written CF only. The improved accuracy during revision for both the direct and indirect written CF groups was sustained in the new writing task (immediate post-test) regarding the comparative but not prepositions of space. The improvement of the indirect group was even better than that of the direct CF group on the new task (immediate post-test) with regard to the comparative. This might suggest that the indirect CF group processed the feedback in greater depth. No long-term effect was found for direct and indirect written CF for either linguistic structure. The quasi-experiment findings suggest that written CF had a short-term effect when targeting not only already-learned linguistic structures (as the majority of the previous research found) but also newly-learned linguistic structures as well. While many studies have examined the effectiveness of written CF on improving the grammatical accuracy of learners during revision and in new writing using quasi-experiment designs, little research has been conducted to explore how students engage with and process this feedback. In the current study, a think aloud protocol (TAP) was used to explore how the students processed and repaired their errors in response to both direct and indirect written CF. The findings show that both the direct and indirect written CF groups generated a similar amount of repair with understanding during their subsequent revision. About 35% of the direct group’s repair was without understanding. This result suggests that not all of the feedback that was noticed and incorporated into the students’ subsequent revision might be understood. Furthermore, the retrospective TAP produced some data that helped to identify some possible reasons why some students repeated their errors and failed to incorporate the written CF into their subsequent revision. One of the most important findings of this research is that certain factors, such as the type of error and the proficiency level of the student, were found to impact on the effectiveness of written CF. Moreover, the combination of a quasi-experiment and TAP in this research is unique, as it helped to understand the written CF from different perspectives.
|
|
Keyword:
direct written corrective feedback; EFL learners; English as a foreign Language; English language Study and teaching Foreign speakers; Individualized education programs; Language teaching; Second language acquisition Oman
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29846
http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/29846/1/The%20effectiveness%20of%20direct%20and%20indirect%20written%20corrective%20feedback%20in%20improving%20the%20grammatical%20accuracy%20of%20Omani%20EFL%20learners%20by%20Sharifa%20Nasser%20Mohammed%20Al%20Harrasi.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
The effectiveness of written corrective feedback on French as a second language accuracy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The Impact of Direct and Indirect Feedback on Idiom Translating Skill of Iranian EFL College Students
|
|
|
|
In: IJOTL-TL (Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics), Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 122-137 (2019) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
La escritura de crónicas periodísticas informativas: una propuesta de avance desde el feedback correctivo escrito
|
|
|
|
In: Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, ISSN 0717-1285, Nº. 46, 2019, pags. 161-185 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Video-based feedback as a method for training rural healthcare workers to manage medical emergencies: a pilot study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
The language learning potential of writing through EFL students’ processing of feedback
|
|
|
|
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 2, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Nuevas tendencias en didáctica de la lengua y la literatura: desafíos y perspectivas), pags. 187-200 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The Effect of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on the Acquisition of Rule-Based and Item-Based Linguistic Features
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Rubrics and Corrective Feedback in ESL Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study of an L2 Writer
|
|
|
|
In: Author (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
The Comparative Effect of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback in Process-Based Vs. Product-Based Writing Instruction on EFL Learners` Writing Performance
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 9, Iss 19, Pp 84-103 (2016) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND WRITING ACCURACY OF STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LEVELS OF GRAMMATICAL SENSITIVITY
|
|
|
|
In: Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2016) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
CAN EFL LEARNERS' LEARNING STYLES IMPACT THEIR PERFORMANCE ON WRITING SKILL UNDER DIRECT AND INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKS?
|
|
|
|
In: Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 155-186 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
The Effect of Different Types of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 14, Pp 23-39 (2014) (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The effects of direct and indirect written corrective feedback (CF) on English-as-a-second-language (ESL) students’ revision accuracy and writing skills
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Changes in physical activity levels, lesson context, and teacher interaction during physical education in culturally and linguistically diverse Australian schools
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
The value of direct and indirect written corrective feedback for intermediate ESL students
|
|
Lu, Yang. - : Auckland University of Technology, 2010
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
