| 4 |
Color figures from the Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Using the Tromsø Recommendations to cite data in language work
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Supporting small languages together: The history and impact of the International Conference on Language Documentation & Conservation series
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Supporting small languages together: The history and impact of the International Conference on Language Documentation & Conservation series
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Tromsø recommendations for citation of research data in linguistics ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Directional reference in discourse and narrative: Comparing indigenous and non-indigenous genres in Ahtna
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Review of The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega: A Linguistic Perspective
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Making Pacific Languages Discoverable: A Project to Catalog the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Library Pacific Collection by Indigenous Languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Data Citation in Linguistics: Looking forward to new standards
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Reflections on reproducible research
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Reproducibility in language documentation and description means that the analysis given in descriptive publication is presented in a way that allows the reader to access the data on which the claims are based, to verify the analysis for themself. Linguists, including Himmelmann, have long pointed to the centrality of documentation data to linguistic description. Over the twenty years since Himmelmann’s 1998 paper we have seen a growth in digital archiving, and the rise of the Open Access movement. Although there is good infrastructure in place to make reproducible research possible, few descriptive publications clearly link to underlying data, and very little documentation data is publicly accessible. We discuss some of the institutional roadblocks to reproducibility, including a lack of support for the development of published primary data. We also look at what work on language documentation and description can learn from the recent replication crisis in psychology. ; National Foreign Language Resource Center
|
|
Keyword:
citation; replication crisis; reproducible research
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24805
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
