| 1 |
The Influence of language categorization on face perception
|
|
|
|
In: TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa) (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
The role of learning on bilinguals’ lexical architecture: beyond separated vs. integrated lexicons
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The Neural basis of free language choice in bilingual speakers: disentangling language choice and language execution
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Holiday or vacation? The processing of variation in vocabulary across dialects
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Anticipation processes in L2 speech comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and lexical recognition task
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
The cortical dynamics of speaking: Lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
The Cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Foreigner talk through word reduction in native/non-native spoken interactions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Processing advantage for emotional words in bilingual speakers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
When the tail counts: the advantage of bilingualism through the ex-gaussian distribution analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
World knowledge integration during second language comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
The impact of early bilingualism on controlling a language learned late: an ERP study
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This study asks whether early bilingual speakers who have already developed a language control mechanism to handle two languages control a dominant and a late acquired language in the same way as late bilingual speakers. We therefore, compared event-related potentials in a language switching task in two groups of participants switching between a dominant (L1) and a weak late acquired language (L3). Early bilingual late learners of an L3 showed a different ERP pattern (larger N2 mean amplitude) as late bilingual late learners of an L3. Even though the relative strength of languages was similar in both groups (a dominant and a weak late acquired language), they controlled their language output in a different manner. Moreover, the N2 was similar in two groups of early bilinguals tested in languages of different strength. We conclude that early bilingual learners of an L3 do not control languages in the same way as late bilingual L3 learners –who have not achieved native-like proficiency in their L2– do. This difference might explain some of the advantages early bilinguals have when learning new languages. ; This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Government/n(PSI2011-23033, Consolider Ingenio 2010 CSD2007-00012) and/nthe Catalan Government (Consolidado SGR 2009-1521). Clara/nD. Martin was supported by the Spanish Government (Grant/nJuan de la Cierva) and is now supported by the IKERBASQUE/nfoundation for science and the Basque Center on Cognition,/nBrain and Language. Mikel Santesteban was supported by the/nBasque Government (IT665-13). Carles Escera was awarded by/nthe ICREA Academia Distinguished Professorship.
|
|
Keyword:
Bilingual proficiency; Language control; LPC; N2 ERP component; Switch cost
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10230/25826
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00815
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
