DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 19 of 19

1
Models of episodic memory
In: The Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology (Oxford, 2015), p. 165-186
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
2
Associative information in memory: evidence from cued recall
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 66 (2012) 1, 109-122
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
3
On the interpretation of removable interactions: a survey of the field 33 years after Loftus
In: Memory & cognition. - Heidelberg [u.a.] : Springer 40 (2012) 2, 145-160
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
4
The effects of word frequency and context variability in cued recall
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 64 (2011) 2, 119-132
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
5
Output interference in recognition memory
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 64 (2011) 4, 316-326
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
6
Corrigendum to “Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: The effects of letter frequency and object frequency” [Journal of Memory and Language 59 (2008) 331–345]
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 60 (2009) 3, 420
OLC Linguistik
Show details
7
Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: the effects of letter frequency and object frequency
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 59 (2008) 3, 331-345
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
8
Corrigendum to “The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect” [J. Mem. Lang. 55 (2006) 461–478]
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 59 (2008) 1, 153
OLC Linguistik
Show details
9
Evidence in Favor of the Early-Phase Elevated-Attention Hypothesis: The Effects of Letter Frequency and Object Frequency
In: Psychology Faculty Publications (2008)
Abstract: One of the most studied and least well understood phenomena in episodic memory is the word frequency effect (WFE). The WFE is expressed as a mirror pattern where uncommon low frequency words (LF) are better recognized than common high frequency words (HF) by way of a higher HR and lower FAR. One explanation for the HR difference is the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis which proposes two stages of encoding. In the first, called the early-phase, words are identified based on orthographic and/or phonological characteristics. LF words are composed of atypical features making their identification more difficult than HF words. This relative difficulty during the early-phase results in the LF HR advantage. The first two experiments test the proposal that LF words are better recognized due to their distinct lexical features. The second stage of encoding, called the late phase, consists of controlled processing where the semantic features of the item are paramount. According to the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis, semantic features of HF and LF words do not differ in diagnosticity and do not contribute to the word frequency effect. We find evidence for this assumption in the final experiment by comparing memory for words and objects.
Keyword: Episodic memory; Memory models; Object memory; Orthography; Psychology; Word frequency effect
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.002
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/psy_facpub/1707
BASE
Hide details
10
Putting context in context
In: The foundations of remembering (New York, NY, 2007), p. 171-190
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
11
The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory : similarity and the strength based mirror effect
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 55 (2006) 4, 461-478
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
12
Differentiating the differentiation models : a comparison of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM) and the subjective likelihood model (SLiM)
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 55 (2006) 4, 447-460
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
13
Differentiating the differentiation models: A comparison of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM) and the subjective likelihood model (SLiM)
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 55 (2006) 4, 447
OLC Linguistik
Show details
14
The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect
In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 55 (2006) 4, 461
OLC Linguistik
Show details
15
Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition
In: Memory & cognition. - Heidelberg [u.a.] : Springer 32 (2004) 8, 1284-1297
OLC Linguistik
Show details
16
Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition
In: Memory & cognition. - Heidelberg [u.a.] : Springer 32 (2004) 8, 1284-1297
OLC Linguistik
Show details
17
Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition
In: Memory & cognition. - Heidelberg [u.a.] : Springer 32 (2004) 8, 1284-1297
BLLDB
Show details
18
Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory
In: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition. - Washington, DC [u.a.] : Assoc. 30 (2004) 4, 778-786
BLLDB
Show details
19
Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory : a comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001)
In: Psychological review. - Washington, DC [u.a.] : American Psychological Association 111 (2004) 3, 800-807
BLLDB
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
1
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern