1 |
What transfers in morphological inflection? Experiments with analogical models ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Formalizing Inflectional Paradigm Shape with Information Theory
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
The Paradigm Discovery Problem
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Interpreting Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Russian Inflectional Morphology
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Stop the Morphological Cycle, I Want to Get Off: Modeling the Development of Fusion
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Normalization may be ineffective for phonetic category learning ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Normalization may be ineffective for phonetic category learning
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Society for Computation in Linguistics (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Giving Good Directions: Order of Mention Reflects Visual Salience
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In complex stimuli, there are many different possible ways to refer to a specified target. Previous studies have shown that when people are faced with such a task, the content of their referring expression reflects visual properties such as size, salience, and clutter. Here, we extend these findings and present evidence that (i) the influence of visual perception on sentence construction goes beyond content selection and in part determines the order in which different objects are mentioned and (ii) order of mention influences comprehension. Study 1 (a corpus study of reference productions) shows that when a speaker uses a relational description to mention a salient object, that object is treated as being in the common ground and is more likely to be mentioned first. Study 2 (a visual search study) asks participants to listen to referring expressions and find the specified target; in keeping with the above result, we find that search for easy-to-find targets is faster when the target is mentioned first, while search for harder-to-find targets is facilitated by mentioning the target later, after a landmark in a relational description. Our findings show that seemingly low-level and disparate mental “modules” like perception and sentence planning interact at a high level and in task-dependent ways.
|
|
Keyword:
Psychology
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01793 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674625/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26696914
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
14 |
Giving Good Directions: Order of Mention Reflects Visual Salience
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
POS induction with distributional and morphological information using a distance-dependent Chinese Restaurant Process
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Where's Wally: the influence of visual salience on referring expression generation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Structured generative models for unsupervised named-entity clustering
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|