| 1 |
Semantic systems are mentalistically activated for and by social partners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Semantic systems are mentalistically activated for and by social partners
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The newborn brain is sensitive to the communicative function of language
|
|
|
|
In: Sci Rep (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Electrophysiological investigation of infants' understanding of understanding
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1878-9293 ; EISSN: 1878-9307 ; Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02868065 ; Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Elsevier, 2020, 43, pp.100783. ⟨10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100783⟩ (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Electrophysiological Investigation of Infants’ Understanding of Understanding
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
An Electrophysiological Abstractness Effect for Metaphorical Meaning Making
|
|
|
|
In: eNeuro (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Fourteen-Month-Old Infants Track the Language Comprehension of Communicative Partners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Fourteen‐month‐old infants track the language comprehension of communicative partners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Metaphors are physical and abstract: ERPs to metaphorically modified nouns resemble ERPs to abstract language
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Metaphorical expressions very often involve words referring to physical entities and experiences. Yet, figures of speech such as metaphors are not intended to be understood literally, word-by-word. We used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to determine whether metaphorical expressions are processed more like physical or more like abstract expressions. To this end, novel adjective-noun word pairs were presented visually in three conditions: (1) Physical, easy to experience with the senses (e.g., “printed schedule”); (2) Abstract, difficult to experience with the senses (e.g., “conditional schedule”); and (3) novel Metaphorical, expressions with a physical adjective, but a figurative meaning (e.g., “thin schedule”). We replicated the N400 lexical concreteness effect for concrete vs. abstract adjectives. In order to increase the sensitivity of the concreteness manipulation on the expressions, we divided each condition into high and low groups according to rated concreteness. Mirroring the adjective result, we observed a N400 concreteness effect at the noun for physical expressions with high concreteness ratings vs. abstract expressions with low concreteness ratings, even though the nouns per se did not differ in lexical concreteness. Paradoxically, the N400 to nouns in the metaphorical expressions was indistinguishable from that to nouns in the literal abstract expressions, but only for the more concrete subgroup of metaphors; the N400 to the less concrete subgroup of metaphors patterned with that to nouns in the literal concrete expressions. In sum, we not only find evidence for conceptual concreteness separable from lexical concreteness but also that the processing of metaphorical expressions is not driven strictly by either lexical or conceptual concreteness.
|
|
Keyword:
Neuroscience
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25713520
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4322728
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00028
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
