1 |
Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Early development of infants with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case series. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Early development of infants with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case series.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: Longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Early development of infants with neurofibromatosis type 1: A case series
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Transfer of learning and the cultural matrix: culture, beliefs and learning in Thailand higher education
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Social communication disorder outside autism? A diagnostic classification approach to delineating pragmatic language impairment, high functioning autism and specific language impairment
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Burdens of proof and the case for unevenness
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
How is the burden of proof to be distributed among individuals who are involved in resolving a particular issue? Under what conditions should the burden of proof be distributed unevenly? We distinguish attitudinal from dialectical burdens and argue that these questions should be answered differently, depending on which is in play. One has an attitudinal burden with respect to some proposition when one is required to possess sufficient evidence for it. One has a dialectical burden with respect to some proposition when one is required to provide supporting arguments for it as part of a deliberative process. We show that the attitudinal burden with respect to certain propositions is unevenly distributed in some deliberative contexts, but in all of these contexts, establishing the degree of support for the proposition is merely a means to some other deliberative end, such as action guidance, or persuasion. By contrast, uneven distributions of the dialectical burden regularly further the aims of deliberation, even in contexts where the quest for truth is the sole deliberative aim, rather than merely a means to some different deliberative end. We argue that our distinction between these two burdens resolves puzzles about unevenness that have been raised in the literature.
|
|
URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10503-012-9285-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9285-4 http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/31994/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
14 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders.
|
|
|
|
In: Human molecular genetics, vol 21, iss 21 (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders.
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0964-6906 ; EISSN: 1460-2083 ; Human Molecular Genetics ; https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00723650 ; Human Molecular Genetics, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2012, 21 (21), pp.4781-92. ⟨10.1093/hmg/dds301⟩ (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on risk for Autism Spectrum Disorders
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorderspi
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorderspi
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|