1 |
“We are not the language police”: comparing multilingual EMI programmes in Europe and Asia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
“Without English this is just not possible…”: studies of language policy and practice in international universities from Europe and Asia ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The power of beliefs: lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
“Without English this is just not possible…”: studies of language policy and practice in international universities from Europe and Asia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
University teachers’ beliefs of language and content integration in English-medium education in multilingual university settings
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Communicative purpose in student genres: evidence from authors and texts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Agreeing to disagree: ‘doing disagreement’ in assessed oral L2 interactions
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
While disagreements are often considered dispreferred choices and potentially face-threatening acts due to their oppositional nature, this perception does not adequately reflect the importance of disagreeing for many types of interaction, such as problem-solving and decision-making. Developing ability in performing this speech act therefore becomes relevant for learners of an L2 in order to show achievements in such general language learning targets as expressing and defending opinions and arguments, as well as negotiating consensual decisions. This paper presents a sequential analysis of disagreements in assessed interactions of advanced German-speaking learners of English, observed in three different exam formats, i.e. teacher-led interview, role play with teacher and paired student interaction. Overall, 33 disagreement episodes were identified in 18 oral exams. Findings show that the choice of examination format constrains range and type of disagreement trajectory enacted by the learners, highlighting the influence of minor contextual differences. Moreover, analyses of these exams suggest that linguistic alignment can and does co-exist with oppositional talk, supporting the notion that the purpose of achieving a successful joint performance of L2 interaction carries weight even when there is disagreement on a content level.
|
|
URL: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/367699/3/19463014%25252E2014%25252E893897.pdf https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/367699/2/Huettner_DisagreementsL2_CD_AAM.pdf https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/367699/1/Huettner_DisagreementsL2_CD_AAM.docx https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/367699/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
9 |
The power of beliefs: lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Theory and Practice in EFL Teacher Education: Bridging the Gap
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Book review.Content and foreign language integrated learning: contributions to multilingualism in European contexts
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
A cross-sectional analysis of oral narratives by children with CLIL and non-CLIL instruction
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Fluent speakers – fluent interactions: on the creation of (co)-fluency in English as a lingua franca
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
ESP teacher education at the interface of theory and practice: introducing a model of mediated corpus-based genre analysis
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|