1 |
Developing, monitoring, and reporting of fidelity in aphasia trials: Core recommendations from the collaboration of aphasia trialists (CATs) trials for aphasia panel
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2022 to 2026 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
ICT usage in aphasia rehabilitation – beliefs, biases, and influencing factors from the perspectives of speech and language therapists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Rating experience of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: co-design of a feedback questionnaire
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Internet delivery of intensive speech and language therapy for children with cerebral palsy: a pilot randomised controlled trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
The methodological quality of short-term/working memory treatments in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Rating experience of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: co-design of a feedback questionnaire
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Perspectives on ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: exploring feasibility, usability and acceptance of this mode of rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: a literature review
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Purpose: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) can provide an option for the delivery of intensive aphasia rehabilitation but the users’ views (i.e., People with Aphasia) must be considered to ensure satisfaction, motivation and adherence with this mode of rehabilitation. The aim of this literature review is to provide a critical overview of studies where feedback was elicited from participants about their experiences with ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation. Methods: A systematic search using six electronic databases was conducted in July 2015 and updated in May 2019. Studies of synchronous telerehabilitation and interventions targeting compensatory strategies were excluded from the review. Studies retrieved were screened for eligibility and information was extracted on the characteristics of each study, methods of data collection and study outcomes. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria including studies with quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods research designs. The studies employed a variety of data collection methods, examining a number of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation activities and the findings investigated aspects of feasibility, usability and acceptance of this mode of rehabilitation. Conclusions: The findings indicate ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation is considered an acceptable mode of rehabilitation by people with aphasia who reported generally positive feedback, though variation among personal perspectives and experience is noted. There is currently no consensus measure of self-reported feedback in ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation.
|
|
Keyword:
Aphasia; Information and Communication Technology; Rehabilitation; Self-reported feedback
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10468/8529 https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1655803
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
13 |
Attention control comparisons with SLT for people with aphasia following stroke: methodological concerns raised following a systematic review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
supplementary_Material – Supplemental material for Attention control comparisons with SLT for people with aphasia following stroke: methodological concerns raised following a systematic review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Attention control comparisons with SLT for people with aphasia following stroke: methodological concerns raised following a systematic review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
supplementary_Material – Supplemental material for Attention control comparisons with SLT for people with aphasia following stroke: methodological concerns raised following a systematic review ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Development of an ICT-delivered control programme for use in aphasia crossover intervention study
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Attention control comparisons with SLT for people with aphasia following stroke: methodological concerns raised following a systematic review
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Co-design of a feedback questionnaire for ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|