1 |
Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution
|
|
|
|
In: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: evidence from eye-tracking
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
It is not well understood whether background speech affects the initial processing of words during reading or only the later processes of sentence integration. Additionally, it is not clear how eye-movements support text comprehension in the face of distraction by background speech and noise. In the present research, participants read single sentences (Experiment 1) and short paragraphs (Experiments 2-3) in four sound conditions: silence, speech-spectrum Gaussian noise, English speech (intelligible to participants), and Mandarin speech (unintelligible to participants). Intelligible speech did not affect the lexical access of words and had a limited effect on the first-pass fixations of words. However, it led to more regressions and more re-reading fixations compared to both unintelligible speech and silence. The results suggested that the distraction is mostly semantic in nature, and there was only limited evidence for a contribution of phonology. Finally, intelligible speech disrupted comprehension only when participants were prevented from re-reading previous words. These findings suggest that the semantic properties of irrelevant speech can disrupt the ongoing reading process, but that this disruption occurs in the post-lexical stages of reading when participants need to integrate words to form the sentence context and to construct a coherent discourse of the text.
|
|
Keyword:
C800 - Psychology
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000680 http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/28794/ http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/28794/1/28794%20Background_speech_HPP_revision2.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
4 |
Lexical processing in children and adults during word copying
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Lexical processing in children and adults during word copying.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Reading text increases binocular disparity in dyslexic children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Reading text increases binocular disparity in dyslexic children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Reading Text Increases Binocular Disparity in Dyslexic Children
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Binocular coordination during scanning of simple dot stimuli
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Binocular coordination during scanning of simple dot stimuli
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|