81 |
Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: evidence from eye movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
82 |
Lexical and sublexical influences on eye movements during reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
83 |
Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
84 |
Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
85 |
Linguistic and non-linguistic influences on the eyes' landing positions during reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
86 |
Children's interpretation of ambiguous focus in sentences with "only"
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
87 |
Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We report three eye-movement experiments that investigated whether alternative syntactic analyses compete during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Previous research (Traxler et al., 1998 and Van Gompel et al., 2001) has shown that globally ambiguous sentences are easier to process than disambiguated sentences, suggesting that competition does not explain processing difficulty. However, the disambiguation in these studies was delayed relative to the initial point of ambiguity, so they do not rule out models which claim that competition is very short-lasting. The current experiments show that globally ambiguous sentences are easier to process than disambiguated sentences even when the disambiguation is immediate. Furthermore, globally ambiguous sentences are no harder to process than syntactically unambiguous sentences. We argue that the results are inconsistent with currently implemented constraint-based competition models, and support variable-choice reanalysis models such as the unrestricted race model.
|
|
Keyword:
C800 - Psychology
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.003 http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/22460/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
88 |
Eye movements when reading disappearing text: Is there a gap effect in reading?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
90 |
Psycholinguistic processes affect fixation durations and orthographic information affects fixation locations: can E-Z reader cope?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
91 |
Processing doubly quantified sentences: evidence from eye movements
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
93 |
The Influence of Focus Operators on Syntactic Processing of Short Relative Clause Sentences
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
94 |
Neighborhood effects using a partial priming methodology: Guessing or activation?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
95 |
Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context: The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
96 |
Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|